Started by jaradpatil at 7:44 p.m. on 03 Jan. 14
I was a principal in a government aided private school. The management terminated me under various allegations. I challenged the termination in the school tribunal, the same was dismissed by the school tribunal. I have challenged the dismissal in the Hon.high court, the case has been admitted and the out come is still awaited. will the I fall under the following statement,
"Persons convicted for any criminal offence involving moral turpitude/economic offence"
Started by Anonymous User at 4:14 p.m. on 03 Jan. 14
I have invested in Maxworth Orchards (so as many)in Tamil Nadu (Tuticoran & Madurai),if any one has any clue about the property status pls let me know,
my id firstname.lastname@example.org
Started by Rekha at 11:02 a.m. on 03 Jan. 14
I am severally abused physically and emotionally by my alcoholic husband. My kids aged 14 & 10yrs are also victimized. I need legal support immediately. Kindly guide me as how should i got about it.
Started by Anonymous User at 10:45 a.m. on 03 Jan. 14
Girls with big tits blogs
erotic acts free sex child erotic sexy
Started by Meghdute at 10:10 p.m. on 02 Jan. 14
498a wife file hma 24 on 03.10.12 but court don't kept this petition on record as per court procedure. And from that day
court even don't move the petition till 15.09.13. In the mean time judge is change and new lady judge come and on 16.09.13 she give an order on hma 24 that husband should pay 3000/- per month and on time litigation cost of Rs.10000/- with out any consideration of HC order of Rs.5000/- as survival allowance on my anti cep bail. Even judge don't ready to hear 151 petition and say if u don't like my order u can go for revision. The case is run in Addl. Sess. judge court.
Now what i will do with this order pls help me.
Thanks & regards
Started by achakala at 6:41 p.m. on 02 Jan. 14
a case was filed in court forging my signature in acknowledgment of debt.what will the court decide
Started by Anonymous User at 9:51 p.m. on 30 Dec. 13
two days back we went to pondy with my two friends while came back from pondychery we brought few bottles liquor (beer,bandy 10 nos) on the tamil nadu toll gate police checked our car and they said we made a mistake bringing drinks from pondychery they asked 2500 Rs fine and they seized all the drinks then took signatures from the person who drove the car and it is harmless case and they will pay fine on behalf of us,today i got the call from the same police station that we should come to the court for the setilment of the case,actual y the person who drove the car did not brought liquor ,how do i save him from this case is it punishable or jailed case?
Started by Anonymous User at 7:33 p.m. on 30 Dec. 13
i want to know that if someone is doing apprentice in any government organisation where he is getting stypend monthly.can this person take admission to any distance learning institutefor education ,like distance learning in deploma in mechanical engg.is that distance learning admission is grnted legal by apprentice act
Started by Anonymous User at 5:49 a.m. on 30 Dec. 13
It is under Prevention of Corruption Act section 13(1)(e). In a D.A. CASE - The CBI Investigating Officer submitted his report stating therein that my Total Income is Rs. 80 lacs. While submitting the Chalan in the the CBI Court, it has been shown as Rs. 50 lacs. Thus D.A. Amount has unnecessary increased by Rs. 30 lacs. I have demanded the F.R. - I and F.R. II from CB I but they have refused saying that it is an internal document. I requested the Court to ask the CBI to produce them in the Court but the CBI court has declined my request. How can I get these reports so that I can established that CBI has maneuvered at the time of putting the Challan in the Court and the D.A. AMOUNT has been increased only by removing the items of Income from the Investigation Report.
Started by Anonymous User at 2:17 p.m. on 29 Dec. 13
A speaking order for promotion to higher post was passed while the case on seniority was subjudice in CAT. The speaking order quashed all the objections raised and held DPC to promote all the persons. The case on seniority is still pending in the CAT for decision. Is it not a case of natural injustice?