Started by Anonymous User at 11:12 a.m. on 25 Feb. 13
Started by Anonymous User at 7:15 p.m. on 24 Feb. 13
please remove this link or modify the content.It is making my address public with a single click on typing ratish singh thakur on google.
Started by vishal000111 at 5:15 p.m. on 24 Feb. 13
I request the website owner to remove the document http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1217051/ and http://indiankanoon.org/doc/147222698/ with immediate effect as it is affecting my personal & social life.
Started by sridharababu at 6:57 p.m. on 23 Feb. 13
If a reportable judgment is proclaimed by any High Court or Supreme court it is every one's right to see and peruse the judgments. I see lot of people asking to remove the cases quoted in their/their clients name. This type of request is meaning less. So i do request admin not to remove any documents unless it is quoted by court itself as non reportable.
Started by amit20 at 4:45 p.m. on 22 Feb. 13
Is there any act in our law if girl married in one state (UP) but presently resident in another state (Delhi) and file a dowry case against her in laws in state where she presently leaving?
Started by Anonymous User at 7:52 p.m. on 20 Feb. 13
are there any judgements by the supreme court of india, where they have penalised the real estate company for selling plots and collecting money from public without having specific government clearances from the government departments, e.g seeking environmental clearance from the central government.
Started by Anonymous User at 7:08 p.m. on 20 Feb. 13
a known of mine has been convicted under fake case of kidnapping, attempt t rape, 365, 211 etc,... but the complaining party has taken their case back. but still dey aree not free from case nor given bail... wot du u suggest????
Started by Anonymous User at 12:43 p.m. on 20 Feb. 13
Started by Anonymous User at 11:14 p.m. on 19 Feb. 13
A FIR has been filed against me by my wife on 23.02.2008 under section 67 of IT Act. I had taken anticipatory bail. The charge-sheet has been filed on 27.06.2012 u/s 498(A),294/506/201 0f IPC/r/w/ sec 4 of D.P.Act /Section 65A/66C/67/67A of IT Act. I sought legal advice and they maintained that charges under section 66A/66C/67A is not maintainable as it has come into force after filing of FIR.
Her allegation is that a fake ID was created in her name and it was used to send vulgar materials to 2/3 E-Mail IDs thus denigrating her image in the society.She has downloaded the materials from the fake ID and handed over to police.
The identity of the IDs to which the objectionable materials were sent is not known.. In fact, it was sent to one E-mail only. Further, she has downloaded the material by accessing the fake ID. How did she come to know of the password?The police has also filed some private chats.
Is transmitting lascivious materials to an e-mail ID whose identity is not known can constitute an offence? Here the recipient is not complainant.
Is opening an ID in the name of wife an offence?
How her reputation was tarnuished?
The offence occured from Oct'06 to Nov'07 . However, the complaint was made on Feb'08 after she walked out of house on Jan'08. . Why she was silnt for so many days?
I want to know whether sec 67 holds good as the recipient is not identified and whether the complainant can claim that her image has suffered because of creation of fake ID.
Started by advocatedvrao at 8:34 p.m. on 18 Feb. 13