Started by Anonymous User at 11:07 p.m. on 09 Nov. 13
5 years gone. Witnesses not appearing in the court. Finally, witness w1 is closed. And conditional order is given still cAse is still going on.
Pl advise if we can go to high court for quashing. Are there any chances to get that quashed? Pl help
Started by Anonymous User at 10:23 p.m. on 04 Nov. 13
Please start uploading recent judgements.
In order to prevent disgruntled elements who are posting irrelevant material, some are posting material in languages which are not Indian, you should introduce a system of log in for which particulars such as name, e-mail, mobile number, profession, age and address must be made compulsory for creating log in.
The site is very useful and it should not be stopped.
Started by Anonymous User at 9 a.m. on 03 Nov. 13
The judgements of various courts are not being uploaded on the 'Indiankanoon' site since October 17, 2013. Please upload the recent judgements of the Courts.
Started by Anonymous User at 6:04 p.m. on 02 Nov. 13
I am working in an MNC since last four years. I got job in another company. But my company is not leaving me in requested period of time saying you have to stay till completion of three months.I cleared my bond of three years also. If I stayed for three months I will loose my job there. I request you to provide me some details if I proceed legally
Started by Anonymous User at 10:59 p.m. on 30 Oct. 13
The below appearing topics are unnecessarily occupying the valuable space of this useful site. Such type of topics without any head and tail must be removed from this important site. The administrator should take action and remove such type of wasteful topics.
Started by Anonymous User at 10:53 p.m. on 30 Oct. 13
Judgement of various Courts and Tribunals have not been uploaded at Indiankanoon site. Please upload the judgement. It is a very very useful site.
Started by Anonymous User at 9:22 a.m. on 27 Oct. 13
Pl rectify the year of Judgment "1800" on your web page http://indiankanoon.org/doc/382940/
"Bombay High Court
Dr. P. Navin Kumar And Others Etc. vs The Bombay Municipal Corporation ... on 1 January, 1800"
Started by Anonymous User at 6:19 p.m. on 26 Oct. 13
As per the sec 67 of limitation act, when landlord determined the tenancy of tenant, he must file suit of recovery within 12 years, if not suit will be bared by limitation and will be liable to be dismissed. In such condition what will be the legal position? is this means that tenant acquire title by adverse possession, but many citation says that mere notice of termination of tenancy is not sufficient to prove adverse possession.
Started by raja12345 at 6:54 p.m. on 25 Oct. 13
wife separated from husband and staying at fathers place and aborted without the knowledge of husband, and instead threatened to lodge a dowry harassment case against husband and his family. please help with the best solutions. and father in law sending gunda's to assault son in law physically.
please help in this matter with a solution.
Started by Anonymous User at 11:47 a.m. on 25 Oct. 13
Resident Welfare Association had got a favorable order from the competent authority for handing over of dues and common areas and facilities in June 2012. The builder filed WPC in High Court with unclean hands and sought a stay on this order in July 2012. The arguments were concluded in July 2013 and the judgement is currently reserved. During the arguments it was clear that the builder does not have case.
The builder is harassing the residents and perpetrating unlawful activities in the complex so as to pressurize the RWA.
What legal recourse does RWA have for requesting the judgement to be pronounced. The WPC needs to be dismissed, so that RWA can gain rights over the common areas and facilities as per the statue. Do we have to wait endlessly for the decision?