Started by mamtoramayur at 11:22 p.m. on 16 April 13
Where the statute does not provide limitation to file a lis in that case the action must be brought before the competent authority or the court within a reasonable time. This proposition is correct or not?
if it is expected to file within a reasonable time then what is the reasonable period?
Started by Anonymous User at 8:16 p.m. on 16 April 13
1. In 2011 My Ex-Employer initiatied Arbitration proceedings as I started my own company in competition to them.
2. Claiming 15 lakhs on breaking the employment bond. Clause - Sole Arbitrator appointed by them as written in Contract. The Contract which is hit by "Section 72 of Contract Act', Restriction of Trade etc...
3. During Cross examination all their false accusation falle flat and found without any evidence, as I provided them all the Email communication which suggests amicable resignation and False claims by them. (they were not expecting me to keep all the records)
4. My Cross examination by them is till pending for 6 months now and they are not looking intersted.
Once day their Lawyer calls me (on Phone) and offer me to compromise and finish the case if I pay 'him' 1,00,000/-
I know their claims are without any proof.
HENCE, my query is - Should I file the case in court if he still pass the award against me (ignoring the settled law) OR pay him..?
Your suggestions/advice/guidence Please!
Started by advrmt3 at 11:46 a.m. on 16 April 13
Is it possible to file Winding Up proceedings of a Co. u/s. 433 or 434 of Companies Act, '56 simultaneously, when Execution proceedings u/s. 36 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 have been filed for an AWARD ?
If so, would it affect either of the proceedings, if the winding up proceedings are filed ?
Started by RAJESH SHARMA at 1:21 a.m. on 16 April 13
I am working in a bank as clerk. An investigation was conducted on 24/06/2010. I gave promotion test on 03/10/2010. I secured 71 marks in the exam. As per the result all the candidate who have successful in the written test was promoted. Min. pass marks was 40 as per the promotion policy. An explanation was called on 13/12/2010 ten days before the final result. I submit my reply. A charge sheet was issued to me on 23/12/2011 with charge of "business outside the scope of employment. Further charge was proved by EO with biased manner. I want to know whether I would be promoted or not? Because no charges sheet/departmental enquiry was pending
Started by Ananth at 5:41 a.m. on 15 April 13
I am Ananth from Chennai having a property in Chennai purchased by my late grandfather,the patta has transferred to my late father. We are five legal haiers including my living mother and all taxes are paid in her name.
My mother made a unconditional settlement deed, stating her one fifth share (1/5)of this property to me and my elder brother.My question is
1. Is the settlement deed valid only during her life or even after death and is there any possibility of my brothers making trouble to me.
2. Can I sell/mortgage or take loan with the share I have.
3. My elder brother who has a 50% share in my mothers 1/5th share is willing to giving it to me. Can he make a release deed to me giving the half of the 1/5th share.
4. At short, I am would like to take the entire 1/5th of my mothers share of the property.
Please guide me accordingly.
email me @ firstname.lastname@example.org for further information.
Thanks and regards
Started by Anonymous User at 5:59 p.m. on 14 April 13
Mavi Vs Delhi Development Authority
Judgement delivered by sh. Ashwani Sarpal , Addl. District & Sessions Judge cum Presiding officer, Appellate Tribunal of MCD, Room No.29, Tis Hazari Court Delhi
Started by Anonymous User at 5:55 p.m. on 14 April 13
Mavi Vs. Delhi Development Authority from Sh. Ashwani Sarpal Addl District & Sessions Judge cum Presiding officer against appeal no. 290/AT/MCD/2012
Started by nitin at 3:46 p.m. on 14 April 13
In my case DRT after the completion of evidence/arguments has passed the following order:
"RESERVED FOR ORDERS"
After 4 days of this order, the other party approached DRAT for transfer of the case to some other DRT and DRAT passed the following orders:
"LIST THE MATTER ON 5.5.2013 FOR HEARING. TILL THE DATE TRIBUNAL BELOW SHALL NOT PROCEED FURTHER WITH THE SAID OA."
I WANT TO ASK THAT WHETHER THE PROCEEDINGS CAN BE STAYED AFTER THE ABOVE SAID ORDER "RESERVED FOR ORDERS? PLEASE REPLY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITH CASE LAWS. THANKS
Started by ajaykumarhingonia at 1:46 p.m. on 14 April 13
I was a Sub-account PA ,At head post-office.?It accounts for 18 sub-office.My joining date is 29/03/2010,one of the Sub-postmaster of One Sub-office,make fraud and directly digested the amount of 3232160/-with help of 3 branch postmaster.As head-postoffice accounts for this Sub-office.
during this period i was also working as system manager at head-postoffice.
In month of Nov.2010 Head postmaster intimate to Supdt of posts ,then enquiry arranged (only departmental enquiry).and after now on about 10/04/2013 ,
Now enquiry results are as follows:-
1.No administrative office is not claimed any responsiblities ,as they inspect Sub-office and Head-office
2.REcovery of Rs.800,000/-is made from 3 Branch postmaster(Directly responsible)
800,000/- also recovered from Sub-postmaster .(Also directly responsible)
*Remaining amount disburshed in 22 officials who are working at other offices and don't have direct attachment to fraudee and this fraud,even some of them don't know the fraudee.
no charge sheet is produced in this regard.
only recovery letters are issued,
Sir please help me and tell me path to fill case at courts,
Started by RAVIRGH at 11:43 a.m. on 14 April 13
A new document is required to be which is connected to a document already filed. the need for document presently being filed arised due to a question in cross examination by plaintiffs lawyer tried to dilute the document orginally filed. so this new document is required to strengthen the defendant's claim. Lower court rejected. High court didn't admitted the writ on delayed grounds. planning to go to SC please provide any case law