Bugs/Features
Groups
All
Feedback
Bugs/Features
Seek opinion on a case
Court Judgments
Central Laws
State Laws
Regulatory Announcements
Anonymous User
Username

Password

Sign up
Start a new topic
qldqcmu fggfagh
Started by Anonymous User at 5:45 a.m. on 05 April 14
sfiygjoejbolboppo, <a href="http://www.kjwogdjgcf.com/">dqvzfgatqj</a> 
sdblipg tciygnb
Started by Anonymous User at 12:04 a.m. on 03 April 14
vrcrtjoejbolboppo, http://www.qriyigydsa.com/ rstagrzsmq 
yvqrach udqqcon
Started by Anonymous User at 5:11 p.m. on 19 March 14
fkqvpjoejbolboppo, <a href="http://www.bpvfmfptyc.com/">vgliazhebl</a> , [url=http://www.epwoygxvjn.com/]knpvodrxay[/url], http://www.ysnrecdxpg.com/ vgliazhebl
UDR SURVEY 19993
Started by Anonymous User at 4:20 p.m. on 08 March 14
VALIDITY
Manral's History
Started by Anonymous User at 11:36 a.m. on 02 March 14
indiankanoon.org/1258321 is not available
Tratment of capital expenditure incurred on leasehold land
Started by nmreddy93 at 2:36 p.m. on 01 March 14
Most of companies like Infrastructure Companies take a land on lease and construct airport and roads or companies take land on lease for long period and at the end of lease period transfer the same constructed building also owner of land  i have to know treatment of capital expenditure incurred on such leasehold land   
judgment
Started by Anonymous User at 10:18 a.m. on 18 Feb. 14
ashok kumar saxena v/s state of madhya pradesh 2012 volume -9 supreme court cases page no-750
ndps case
Started by Anonymous User at 10:01 a.m. on 05 Feb. 14
Riyaz s/o. Razak Menon vs. State of Maharashtra (Criminal Application No.3196/2010) (supra), it appears that alprazolam and diazepam powders were seized from the accused. The order shows that it was argued that the said substances do not come within the ambit of Section 8(c) of the NDPS Act and that the said substance seized from the manufacturer therein may fall within the ambit of Drugs and Cosmetics Act and therefore, NDPS Act could not be applicable.
Sanjay Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Others, S. L. P. Criminal No. 9967 of 2011
Started by Rajeev Ranjan Pathak at 6:09 p.m. on 02 Feb. 14
Item No. 40             Court No. 5      Section II A
               SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                Record Of Proceedings
Petition(s) for Special Leave To Appeal (Crl.) No. 9967/2011
(From The Judgment and Order dated 22/07/2011 in CRLM No. 13116/2009 of The High Court of Patna)
Sanjay Kumar                          Petitioner(s)
                    Versus
State Of Bihar & Anr.                 Respondent(s)

(with Appln (s) for stay and Office Report)
Date:  22/11/2013   This Petition was called on for hearing today.
Coram: 
Hon'ble Dr. Justice B. S. Chauhan
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. A. Bobde
For Petitioner(s)   Mr. Basant Kumar Choudhary, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr. Rituraj Choudhary, Adv.
                    Mr. Mayur Chaturvedi Adv.
                For Mr. Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv.

For Respondent(s)   Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv.
                    Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv.
Upon hearing counsel the Court made the following
                    ORDER
List the Matter for final hearing on a non miscellaneous day.

(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI)                   (M. S. NEGI)
  Court Master                        Court Master


www.advocatekhoj.com/library/judgments/announcement.php?WID

Decided on 28.01.2014
In such a chaotic situation, any “Arzi”, “Farzi”, 
half-baked lawyer under the label of “proxy counsel”, a 
4phrase not traceable under the Advocates Act, 1961 or under 
the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 etc., cannot be allowed to 
abuse and misuse the process of the court under a false 
impression that he has a right to waste public time without 
any authority to appear in the court, either from the 
litigant or from the AOR, as in the instant case. The AOR, 
with impunity was disdainful towards the order of this Court 
directing him to appear in the court. He had also not filed 
any appearance for the counsel who had appeared, nor the said counsel disclosed his name.
                     
Ram Niwas Vyas & Others Vs H. Srinivas Bhati & Others
Started by Rajeev Ranjan Pathak at 5:20 p.m. on 02 Feb. 14
C.A. No. 628 of 2003

ITEM NO.107 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIIA

 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 628 OF 2003
RAMNIVAS VYAS & ORS. Appellant (s)
 VERSUS
H. SRINIVASA BHATI & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With office report )
Date: 18/09/2013 This Appeal was called on for hearing 
 today.
CORAM :
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA
For Appellant(s) Mr.Manu Shanker Mishra, Adv.
 Mr. A. Subba Rao,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Adv.
Mr. K. Parameshwar, Adv.
 UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
 O R D E R 
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the 
signed judgment.
(Parveen Kr.Chawla)
Court Master
(Phoolan Wati Arora)
Court Master
[signed judgment is placed on the file]
1 2 Next