Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 5 docs
Dharam Singh vs Bishan Sarup on 25 August, 1937
Ch. Pahlad Singh vs Niadar Singh And Anr. on 21 April, 1938
Mohammad Mohtashim And Anr. vs Joti Prasad on 17 January, 1941
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs The Bombay Trust Corporation ... on 17 July, 1936
Mane Kunal Naresh vs Pawar Vithal Jyoti And Others on 13 January, 1999

User Queries
[Section 33] [Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 33(2) in The Specific Relief Act, 1963
(2) Where a defendant successfully resists any suit on the ground-
(a) that the instrument sought to be enforced against him in the suit is voidable, the court may if the defendant has received any benefit under the instrument from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party or to make compensation for it;
(b) that the agreement sought to be enforced against him in the suit is void by reason of his not having been competent to contract under section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872 ), the court may, if the defendant has received any benefit under the agreement from the other party, require him to restore, so far as may be, such benefit to that party, to the extent to which he or his estate has benefited thereby. CHAP DECLARATORY DECREES CHAPTER VI DECLARATORY DECREES