Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 91 docs - [View All]
P.N.Gopinathan, ... vs Sivadasan, S/O.Kunju on 27 September, 2006
Union Bank Of India vs M.P. Sreedharan Kartha And Ors. on 3 September, 1992
Col. K.S. Malik And Anr. vs Oriental Bank Of Commerce And Ors. on 25 August, 2003
Canara Bank vs Gokuldas Shenoy And Anr. on 9 December, 1988
Parvataneni Venkata Brahmarao vs The Andhra Bank Ltd., Gudivada And ... on 8 November, 1963

Loading...
User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 139 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872
139. Discharge of surety by creditor' s act or omission impairing surety' s eventual remedy.- If the creditor does any act which is inconsistent with the rights of the surety, or omits to do any act which his duty to the surety requires him to do, and the eventual remedy of the surety himself against the principal debtor is thereby impaired, the surety is discharged. Illustrations
(a) B contracts to build a ship for C for a given sum, to be paid by instalments as the work reaches certain stages. A becomes surety to C for B' s due performance of the contract. C, without the knowledge of A, prepays to B the last two instalments. A is discharged by this prepayment.
(b) C lends money to B on the security of a joint and several promissory note made in C' s favour by B, and by A as surety for B, together with a bill of sale of B' s furniture, which gives power to C to sell the furniture, and apply the proceeds in discharge of the note. Subsequently, C sells the furniture, but, owing to his misconduct and wilful negligence, only a small price is realized. A is discharged from liability on the note.
(c) A puts M as apprentice to B, and gives a guarantee to B for M' s fidelity. B promises on his part that he will, at least once a month, see M make up the
1. See s. 44, supra.
cash. B omits to see this done as promised, and M embezzles. A is not liable to B on his guarantee.