Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 3 docs
Dominion Of India As Owner Of ... vs Gaya Pershad Gopal Narain on 9 February, 1955
Nutan Kumar And Others vs Iind Additional District Judge, ... on 20 May, 1993
Hemant Madhukar Patil vs Shakuntala Arvind Bramhabhatt ... on 9 January, 2002

Loading...
User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 166 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872
166. Bailee not responsible on re- delivery to bailor without title.- If the bailor has no title to the goods, and the bailee, in good faith, delivers them back to, or according to the directions of, the
1. S. 161 has been declared to apply to the responsibility of the Trustees of the Port of Madras as to goods in their possession, see the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 (Mad. 2 of 1905 ).
2. As to railway contracts, see the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (9 of 1890 ), s. 72.
bailor, the bailee is not responsible to the owner in respect of such delivery 1[ .