Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 199 docs - [View All]
Neminath Appayya Hanamannanavar vs Jamboorao Satappa Kocheri on 20 August, 1964
Damodar Valley Corporation vs Cesc Ltd. on 13 February, 2004
Hindustan Shipyard Limited vs Essar Oil Limited And Ors. on 29 September, 2004
State Bank Of India vs Smt. Neela Ashok Naik And Another on 10 September, 1999
Vale Australia Pty Limited vs Steel Authority Of India Limited on 30 March, 2012

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 34 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872
34. When event on which contract is contingent to be deemed impossible, if it is the future conduct of a living person.- If the future event on which a contract is contingent is the way in which a person will act at an unspecified time, the event shall
1. Cf. the Gaming Act (8 and 9 Vict., c. 109), s. 18,
be considered to become impossible when such person does anything which renders it impossible that he should so act within any definite time, or otherwise than under further contingencies. Illustration A agrees to pay B a sum of money if B marries C. C marries D. The marriage of B to C must now be considered impossible, although it is possible that D may die and that C may afterwards marry B.