Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 570 docs - [View All]
Deoman Upadhyaya vs State on 24 August, 1959
Naresh Chandra Das And Anr. vs Emperor on 28 August, 1941
Vijay Kumar And Anr. vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 25 April, 1978
Vishal Yadav vs State Of U.P on 2 April, 2014
State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu@ Afsan Guru on 4 August, 2005

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
27. How much of information received from accused may be proved.- Provided that, when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any
1. For prohibition of such inducements, etc., see the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act 5 of 1898 ), s. 343. 2. As to statements made to a police- officer investigating a case, see s. 162, ibid. 3. A Coroner has been declared to be a Magistrate for the purposes of this section, see the Coroners Act, 1871 (4 of 1871 ), s. 20. 4. Ins. by Act 3 of 1891, s. 3. 5. The words" or in Burma" rep. by the A. O. 1937. 6. See now the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act 5 of 1898 ).
offence, in the custody of a police- officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.