Mobile View
Main Search Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 8 docs - [View All]
Vishwanath Gupta vs Cegat & Ors. on 14 July, 2000
Vareed S/O. Kunnan Ouseph vs Mary, Daughter Of Adattukaran ... on 29 May, 1968
Devi Dayal Aluminium Industries ... vs State Of U.P. & Others on 13 January, 2010
Prabha Singh Jaswant Singh vs B. Mohammed Yousuff And Anr. on 15 March, 2006
S.M.K.A. Enterprises vs Suchita Industries on 31 July, 2007

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 115 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
115. Cognizance of certain offences and the powers of police officer for search and seizure.—
(1) No court shall take cognizance of an offence under section 107 or section 108 or section 109 except on complaint in writing made by the Registrar or any officer authorised by him in writing: Provided that in relation to clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 107, a court shall take cognizance of an offence on the basis of a certificate issued by the Registrar to the effect that a registered trade mark has been represented as registered in respect of any goods or services in respect of which it is not in fact registered.
(2) No court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try an offence under this Act.
(3) The offences under section 103 or section 104 or section 105 shall be cognizable.
(4) Any police officer not below the rank of deputy superintendent of police or equivalent, may, if he is satisfied that any of the offences referred to in sub-section (3) has been, is being, or is likely to be, committed, search and seize without warrant the goods, die, block, machine, plate, other instruments or things involved in committing the offence, wherever found, and all the articles so seized shall, as soon as practicable, be produced before a Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be: Provided that the police officer, before making any search and seizure, shall obtain the opinion of the Registrar on facts involved in the offence relating to trade mark and shall abide by the opinion so obtained.
(5) Any person having an interest in any article seized under sub-section (4), may, within fifteen days of such seizure, make an application to the Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be, for such article being restored to him and the Magistrate, after hearing the applicant and the prosecution, shall make such order on the application as he may deem fit.