Mobile View
Main Search Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 7 docs - [View All]
Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... vs Surya Kanta Dalmia on 28 October, 2005
Vishnudas Trading As Vishnudas vs The Vazir Sultan Tobaccoco. Ltd. ... on 9 July, 1996
Eveready Industries India ... vs Subrata Das & Ors on 24 April, 2009
American Home Products ... vs Mac Laboratories Private Limited ... on 30 September, 1985
Nasik Hing Supplying Company vs Annapurna Gruh Udyog Bhandar on 4 March, 2003

[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 133 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
133. Preliminary advice by the Registrar as to distinctiveness.—
(1) The Registrar may, on application made to him in the prescribed manner by any person who proposes to apply for the registration of a trade mark, give advice as to whether the trade mark appears to him prima facie to be distinctive.
(2) If, on an application for the registration of a trade mark as to which the Registrar has given advice as aforesaid in the affirmative made within three months after the advice was given, the Registrar, after further investigation or consideration, gives notice to the applicant of objection on the ground that the trade mark is not distinctive, the applicant shall be entitled, on giving notice of withdrawal of the application within the prescribed period, to have repaid to him any fee paid on the filing of the application.