Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 394 docs - [View All]
Smt. Lata Kamat vs Vilas on 29 March, 1989
Smt. Sunanda Kar Alias Ratha vs Sudip Ratha on 29 November, 2005
Hindu Marriage Aci, 1955 A And Special Marriage Act, 1954. March, 1974
Interpretation Of Fraud As Matrimonial Offence
G. Anuradha vs G. Narayana Rao on 26 September, 1996

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 12 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
12. Voidable marriages.
(1) Any marriage solemnized, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be voidable and may be annulled by a decree of nullity on any of the following grounds, namely:-
(a) 5[ that the marriage has not been consummated owing to the importance of the respondent; or]
(b) that the marriage is in contravention of the condition specified in clause (ii) of section 5; or
(c) that the consent of the petitioner, or where the consent of the guardian in marriage of the petitioner 6[ was required under
1. Ins. by Act 68 of 1976, s. 3.
2. Sub- section (2) omitted by s. 3, ibid.
3. Subs. by s. 4. ibid., for sub- section (1).
4. Ins. by s. 5, ibid.
5. Subs. by s. 6, ibid, for cl. (a).
6. subs. by Act 2 of, 1978, s. 6 and Sch. for certain words (w. e. f. 1- 10- 1978 ).
section 5 as it stood immediately before the commencement of the Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1978 ], (2 of 1978 ) the consent of such guardian was obtained by force 1[ or by fraud as to the nature of the ceremony or as to any material fact or circumstances concerning the respondent]; or
(d) that the respondent was at the time of the marriage pregnant by some person other than the petitioner.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1), no petition for annulling a marriage-
(a) on the ground specified in clause (c) of sub- section (1) shall be entertained if-
(i) the petition is presented more than one year after the force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered; or
(ii) the petitioner has, with his or her full consent, lived with the other party to the marriage as husband or wife- after the force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered;
(b) on the ground specified in clause (d) of sub- section (1) shall be entertained unless the court is satisfied-
(i) that the petitioner was at the time of the marriage ignorant of the facts alleged;
(ii) that proceedings have been instituted in the case of a marriage solemnized before the commencement of this Act within one year of such commencement and in the case of marriages solemnized after such commencement within one year from the date of the marriage; and
(iii) that marital intercourse with the consent of the petitioner has not taken place since the discovery by the petitioner of the existence of 2[ the said ground].