Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 2 docs
The Income- Tax Act, 1995
Section 254 in The Income- Tax Act, 1995
Citedby 133 docs - [View All]
Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals , ... vs Department Of Income Tax on 15 March, 2012
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, vs Assessee on 17 April, 2012
Kisan Discretionary Family Trust vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 2 November, 2007
Lanco Tanjore Power Co Ltd. ... vs Department Of Income Tax on 21 August, 2013
Mahindra Realty & Infrastructure ... vs Assessee on 27 April, 2011

User Queries
Supreme Court of India
Goetze (India) Ltd. vs Cit on 24 March, 2006
Equivalent citations: (2006) 204 CTR SC 182, 2006 284 ITR 323 SC
Bench: M R Pal, M R Pal, D Bhandari

ORDER

Leave granted.

2.

The question raised in this appeal relates to whether the appellant assessee could make a claim for deduction other than by filing a revised return. The assessment year in question was 1995-96. The return was filed on 30-11-1995, by the appellant for the assessment year in question. On 12-1-1998, the appellant sought to claim a deduction by way of a letter before the assessing officer. The deduction was disallowed by the assessing officer on the ground that there was no provision under the Income Tax Act to make amendment in the return of income by modifying an application at the assessment stage without revising the return.

3.

This appellant's appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was allowed. However, the order of the further appeal of the department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was allowed. The appellant has approached this court and has submitted that the Tribunal was wrong in upholding the assessing officer's order. He has relied upon the decision of this court in National Thermal Power Company Ltd. v. CIT (1998) 229 ITR 383, to contend that it was open to the assessee to raise the points of law even before the Appellate Tribunal.

4.

The decision in question is that the power of the Tribunal under section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is to entertain for the first time a point of law provided the fact on the basis of which the issue of law can be raised before the Tribunal. The decision does not in any way relate to the power of the assessing officer to entertain a claim for deduction otherwise than by filing a revised return. In the circumstances of the case, we dismiss the civil appeal. However, we make it clear that the issue in this case is limited to the power of the assessing authority and does not impinge on the power of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. There shall be no order as to costs.