Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 33 docs - [View All]
M/S Lakhan Pal Shyam Kumar vs M/S Ram Prasad Gupta & Anr on 24 May, 2012
Cadila Healthcare Limited vs Lupin Laboratories Ltd. And Anr. on 26 April, 2006
M/S Shakti Traders vs M/S Shakti Press Ltd on 29 July, 2008
Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Allergan Inc. on 24 July, 2006
Officine Lovata S.P.A. vs Ajay Kumar Aggarwal And Anr. on 1 May, 2005

Loading...
User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 134 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999
134. Suit for infringement, etc., to be instituted before District Court.-
(1) No suit-
(a) for the infringement of a registered trade mark; or
(b) relating to any right in a registered trade mark; or
(c) for passing off arising out of the use by the defendant of any trade mark which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiff' s trade mark, whether registered or unregistered, shall be instituted in any court inferior to a District Court having jurisdiction to try the suit.
(2) For the purpose of clauses (a) and (b) of sub- section (1), a" District Court having jurisdiction'' shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 or any other law for the time being in force, include a District Court w thin the local limits of whose jurisdiction, at the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding, the person instituting the suit or proceeding, or, where there are more than one such persons any of them, actually and voluntarily resides or ca ries on business or personally works for gain. Explanation.- For the purposes of sub- section (2)," person'' includes the registered proprietor and the registered user.