1 - 10 of 3152 (0.98 seconds)
India
Union Of India & Anr vs R. Swaminathan on 12 September, 1997 Author: M S Manohar
Bench ... PETITIONER:
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
R. SWAMINATHAN
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/09/1997
BENCH:
J. S. VERMA
Supreme Court of India
India
The Deputy Inspector General Of ... vs K.S. Swaminathan on 4 October, 1996 Bench: K Ramaswamy, S Kurdukar
PETITIONER ... DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
K.S. SWAMINATHAN
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/10/1996
BENCH:
K. RAMASWAMY
Supreme Court of India
Court of India
Carona Ltd vs M/S Parvathy Swaminathan & Sons on 5 October, 2007 Author: C Thakker
Bench ... PETITIONER:
CARONA LTD
RESPONDENT:
M/S PARVATHY SWAMINATHAN & SONS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/10/2007
BENCH:
C.K. THAKKER
Supreme Court of India
Madras High Court
The Executive Officer vs V.Swaminathan on 30 April, 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... Panchayat,
Harur Taluk,
Dharmapuri District. ... Appellant
-Vs-
1.V.Swaminathan
2.The State of Tamil Nadu,
rep., by its Secretary
Madras High Court
India
Government Of India Represented ... vs K.V. Swaminathan on 18 November, 1996 Equivalent citations: 1996 (8) SCALE
Supreme Court of India
understand their claim:
A)
Annexure P 1
Shanika
From: Swaminathan G [swami@trimexgroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October ... this area is all closed from Thursday
Best regards
Swaminathan
Low Monohydrate Grade Bauxite
Typical Analysis
Parameter Range Base spec
Supreme Court of India
Kerala High Court
M. Swaminathan vs C.K. Jayalakshmi Amma And Ors. on 24 July, 1987 Equivalent citations ... respondent
executed an agreement in favour of the appellant Swaminathan on January
3, 1977 whereby the vehicle was transferred
Kerala High Court
appointment was made by Dr. M. S. Swaminathan (Respondent 4) in
his caRa,city as the Director-General ... counsel for the petitioners, as follows :-
A. That Dr. Swaminathan and Dr. M. S. Naik were biased against the
petitioners
Delhi High Court
position to agree with Mr. Govind Swaminathan appearing
for the petitioners that the ratio in Shukla's case would apply ... under Art.
226. If the contention of Mr. Govind Swaminathan that Art. 359 will
apply only to writ proceedings under
Madras High Court
Madras High Court
N.Chinnasamy vs P.S.Swaminathan on 29 August, 2006
Dated: 29.8.2006
Coram:
The HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE ... Chinnasamy .. Petitioner
vs.
P.S.Swaminathan .. Respondent
Revision Petition filed against the order dated 1.11.2004, passed
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -