1 - 10 of 15912 (1.43 seconds)
think Z' s evidence on that trial is so contradictory that he must be stupid or dishonest." A is within
Central Government Act
proceeded with,
resulting into any conflicting, inconsistent or contradictory decrees. At
that stage, on or about 2.3.1987 applications seem ... possibility of any such decision on merits resulting in
contradictory decrees in the same cause or subject matter.
On behalf
Supreme Court of India
Gujarat High Court
Bhagwanji Vishavji Thakkar vs Pravinchandra Jivanbhai Patadia ... on 24 March, 1995 Equivalent
Gujarat High Court
statement on oath at one time, and a
directly contradictory one at another. The charge must not only allege
which ... prepared
with confirmatory evidence, independent of the other contradictory
statement, to establish the falsity of that which is impeached
Allahabad High Court
that alternative charges
could not be framed where the contradictory statements fell under
different parts of Section ... Indian Penal Code. In illustration (b) the two
contradictory statements constitute the corpus delicti and what cannot
be proved
Bombay High Court
before the learned Judge with regard to
the alleged contradictory statements and it has been impossible to
discover exactly what ... witness and would
represent him as having made a contradictory statement or statements
which he might have possibly been able
Calcutta High Court
Madras High Court
M.Sathiyamoorthy, I.A.S vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on
Madras High Court
above two statements made by the applicant were so
contradictory to each other that one of them was necessarily false ... witness box deliberately made two statements which are so
contradictory to, and irreconcilable with, each other, that both cannot
possibly
Allahabad High Court
that alternative charges
could not be framed where the contradictory statements fell under
different parts of Section ... Indian Penal Code. In illustration (b)tha two
contradictory statements constitute the corpus celicta and what cannot
be proved
Bombay High Court
stated as follows:
"That there are two contradictory statements by Mat. Draupdi Pw/4
and Mst. Bhanwari ... proved
at the trial. There being thus two contradictory versions, a question
arises whether the version as given
Rajasthan High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -