Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 4747 (3.91 seconds)

right of a coparcener to maintain a suit for permanent injunction under section 38 of, restraining the manager or Karta ... suit in the Court of the Sub-Judge for permanent injunction, restraining the defendant No.1 from selling or alienating
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 11 - Cited by 43 -
1988 AIR 576
- P B Ray - Full Document
disturbed his possession. Suit No. 79/49 was for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession ... from Kalyana Sundram Iyer but the suit was for permanent injunction and since the plaintiff was not in actual possession
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 4 - Cited by 10 - Kapadia - Full Document
Misra, C.J. 1. Plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with her possession and enjoyment ... Counsel for the petitioner contends that a suit for permanent injunction cannot abate under the provisions of the Orissa
Orissa High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 7 -
AIR 1982 Ori 48
- R Misra - Full Document
sought the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any way interfering with the plaintiff's right ... untrue and thus, the plaintiff was not entitled for permanent injunction asked
Madras High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
under :--- "In a suit simpliciter for a permanent injunction, is it necessary to frame an issue of tenancy either ... Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bevarai, District Beed, for a permanent injunction simpliciter for restraining the defendant No. 1---Ganpatrao
Bombay High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 5 -
1987 (3) BomCR 258
- B Deo - Full Document
consideration in these revisions is whether a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' possession ... title to the suit lands and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with his peaceful possession
Orissa High Court
- Cites 39 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1985 Ori 202
- J Mohanty - Full Document
present respondent against the present appellants for permanent injunction restraining the appellants from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment ... held that the plaintiff is not entitled to permanent injunction and consequently dismissed the suit without costs. Aggrieved
Andhra High Court
- Cites 22 - Cited by 4 -
1995 (1) ALT 766
- B Somasekhara - Full Document
noticed that in a suit for permanent injunction under Section 58 of the Specific Relief Act by a coparcener against ... suit. Secondly, the plaintiff-respondents brought this suit for permanent injunction restraining their father, defendant 1, from selling or alienating
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 4 -
2000 (2) CTC 417
- Full Document
that she is the Legal Heir of Chinnapoovan; (ii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 3 from interfering with ... Chinnapoovan of plaint A Schedule immovable property; (iii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 3 from withdrawing the Fixed
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 4 -
2003 (4) CTC 268
- Full Document
suit of the 2nd defendant for permanent injunction has been dismissed and in OS No. 11/89, suit ... meantime, the 3rd defendant had filed a suit for permanent injunction against the 1st plaintiff and her husband K. Ramankutty
Andhra High Court
- Cites 22 - Cited by 3 -
AIR 1997 AP 53
- Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next