1 - 10 of 71621 (3.53 seconds)
High Court held
that even an order of attachment before judgment would
automatically revive on restoration of a suit ... plaintiff in a suit who has got
an attachment before judgment should
have again, after the restoration of the
suit
Supreme Court of India
respondent obtained an order for attachment before judgment of
certain immoveable property of the judgment-debtor. The petitioner
having obtained ... September 1916
put an end to the attachment before judgment, and that therefore the
petitioner's security over the property
Madras High Court
made absolute on 10th October 1923 was an
attachment before judgment, and it is contended that an attachment
before judgment ... attachment when
made was an attachment made before judgment. Attachment actually made
after judgment cannot be deemed
Madras High Court
suit
they applied for and got an attachment before judgment of the joint
family properties. The suit was compromised ... amount realised. It also provided that the
attachment before judgment which has already been made would continue
until the amount
Madras High Court
Periyakulam against
Kumaraswami Mudali. In March, 1917 he attached before judgment certain
piece-goods, the property of the defendant. They ... April 14, 1917
attached before judgment the money in deposit in Sub-bier's suit. He
got a decree
Madras High Court
property of the judgment-debtor had been attached
before judgment. After the attachment the suit was dismissed but no
order ... property to
sale on the strength of the attachment before judgment. The person who
had purchased the property from
Madras High Court
case of the claims arising out of
attachments before judgment to give the unsuccessful party six years in
which ... effect 'of the provisions as regards attachment before judgment is1 in
exceptional cases to allow that step to be taken
Madras High Court
under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC to grant attachment before judgment by
attaching cash of Rs.4 lakhs lying ... attachment before judgment is not granted it will be very
difficult to recover the dues from the defendant
Andhra High Court
same time asked for an attachment
before judgment of the decree in O.S. No. 95 of 1932 which ... Subordinate Judge passed an
interim order of attachment before judgment. On 10th August 1935 he
granted respondent 1 a personal
Madras High Court
during the pendency
of Monomoy Banerjee's attachment the judgment-debtor sold the property
' privately to Debendra Nath Dutta ... Bhila obtained on the
13th April; 1920, an attachment before judgment. Chhaganlal, the
respondent in the appeal, obtained an attachment
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -