1 - 10 of 915 (0.67 seconds)
been guilty of incestuous adultery, or of bigamy with adultery, or of marriage with another woman with adultery
Central Government Act
consanguinity (whether natural or legal) or affinity:
(7) " Bigamy with adultery."-" bigamy with adultery" means adultery with the same woman ... with whom the bigamy was committed:
(8) " Marriage with another woman."-" marriage with another woman" means marriage of any person
Central Government Act
convicts B of adultery. Afterwards, C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A' s lifetime. C says that
Central Government Act
take another wife,
which would otherwise be an illegal bigamy. Petitioner
prays that there should be interdiction of the proposed ... which the punishment
for bigamy is also provided. This Section lays down as
under:- "17. Punishment of bigamy.- Any marriage
Supreme Court of India
Penal Code (Act 45 of 1860), ss. 494, 109-Bigamy and
abetment thereof-Admission of accused Whether sufficient
proof ... husband. In appeal to this
Court,
Held: In a bigamy case the second marriage has to be proved
Supreme Court of India
Bigamy, offence of under section 494 I.P.C.-Admission
and legal evidence of actual marriage by custom of nata ... must
be held to have committed the offence of Bigamy as
contemplated by section 494 I.P.C. [1176A
Supreme Court of India
question. Even Section 491, Penal Code, which
makes bigamy an offence applies to Parsis, Christians and others ... Further, under the Indian Penal Code
the offence of bigamy is compoundable. It is not so under the Hindu
Bigamous
Bombay High Court
they would
not constitute an offence of abetment of bigamy against these
petitioners. It is further submitted that under ... that the complainant has no personal knowledge of the bigamy
marriage and the role played by any of the accused
Madras High Court
another wife namely, Anita and, therefore, is guilty of bigamy.
Pursuant to the directions issued by the Chief Fire Officer ... Officer submitted his report holding the
petitioner guilty of bigamy and, therefore, guilty of misconduct under
Rule 29 of Conduct
Allahabad High Court
wife and that since such marriage would amount to bigamy,
the plaintiff had a right to ask for an injunction ... allegation, her husband embarking upon an act of bigamy, to restrain
him from transgressing the provision of the Hindu Marriage
Karnataka High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -