1 - 10 of 5616 (0.30 seconds)
which constitutes the abetment. Illustrations
(a) A offers a bribe to B, a public servant, as a reward for showing ... exercise of B' s official functions. B accepts the bribe. A has abetted the offence defined in section
Central Government Act
offence, or with both. Illustrations
(a) A offers a bribe to B, a public servant, as a reward for showing ... official functions. B refuses to accept the bribe. A is punishable under this section.
(b) A instigates B to give
Central Government Act
prosecution proved that the amount
was paid as a bribe; (4) The presumption was rebutted by the
appellant's explanation ... alleging that the
appellant was attempting to obtain a bribe. Laying a trap,
is a part of the investigation
Supreme Court of India
alleged to have met Prem Nath Sharma & demanded bribe of
Rs. 2000/- for helping them in the case ... After the final
parleys regarding the payment of the bribe had been settled, the
complainant Prem Nath Sharma contacted
Supreme Court of India
prostitute. The appellant then demanded a bribe of Rs.
100/- from Ramesh and party, warning that in the event ... identity and accused the appellant of having received a bribe. The
appellant kept mum. The Inspector then recovered the currency
Supreme Court of India
People Act, 1951 in that he offered a
bribe to the respondent to induce him not to contest the
election ... failed to prove the allegation of
the offer of bribe. [465B-C]
(a) The respondent bore a serious animus against
Supreme Court of India
which appellant was apprehended after he had
accepted the bribe. The plea of the appellant in his statement
under Section ... question as to the handing over of any bribe and
recovery of the same from the accused should be
considered
Supreme Court of India
other. Eventually both the officers demanded Rs. 400/-
as bribe from him for setting right the record, which according ... Singh and Sitaram in compliance with their demand for bribe. The two
motbirs were directed to watch, see and hear
Supreme Court of India
held that the money had been taken as a bribe, that the
defence story was improbable and untrue, that ... proved that the money was accepted as a bribe, (iii) and
that even if the presumption arose it was rebutted
Supreme Court of India
certain percentage of his bills as a bribe. It is
sufficient to say that both the courts have found that ... held that the appellant did make a demand
for bribe in June, 1957, when he visited Tolkeshwar and that
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -