1 - 10 of 16150 (1.68 seconds)
Kant and his family members and no body challenged the sale deeds dated
2.7.1977 or 10.7.1991. The dispute arose only ... Government of Rajasthan
might have been advised to challenge the sale deed dated 10.7.2000
because of the fact that
Rajasthan High Court
also alleged that it was necessary to challenge the sale deed dated
4.10.1985 in favour of the defendants ... dawned upon them for the first time to challenge
the sale deed dated 4.10.1985 in favour of the petitioner-defendant
Supreme Court of India
suit No. 108 of 1958
respectively challenging the sale deed dated 22nd
110
August ... aforesaid sale deed, Ext. B-5 dated
22nd August, 1955 and a mortgage deed Ext. B-49 in favour
Supreme Court of India
that petitioner filed a suit for
declaration challenging the sale deed dated 8.7.2004 purported to have been
executed by Labhu ... suit. It is to
be noted that plaintiff challenged the sale deed executed by
defendant No.1 in favour
Punjab-Haryana High Court
considered is whether the plaintiff should
have challenged the sale deed. The plaint shows that the prayer is only
made ... below held that it is not necessary to challenge the sale
deed, 'since the sale is void. To arrive
Kerala High Court
light of the following facts.
The sale deeds were challenged as collusive.
The sale deeds were entered into only ... regard may be summarised that certified copies of the sale deeds are admissible to
show the transaction recorded in such
Allahabad High Court
favour of defendant Iqbal Ahmed. The challenge to the sale
deed was inter alia on the ground that no sale ... burden to prove the ground of
challenge of the sale deed was on the plaintiff and the plaintiff
Allahabad High Court
aware of the fact that Nruplal had executed the
sale deed (Ext. B). This is evident from the notice ... dicated that Bira Mahendra
had no right to challenge the sale deed. Nruplal lived until 1958,
i. e. for seven
Orissa High Court
inadequate consideration.
The plaint sets out that the aforesaid sale deed was executed to pay
off a mortgage decree ... impugned sale deed dated the 14th of June, 1945.
23. We may then point out that this mortgage deed
Allahabad High Court
landlord Poonam Chand
and consequently cannot challenge the validity of the sale-deed Ex.
3?
(2) Whether the learned District ... that circumstance he is estopped from challenging the sale-deed Ex. A.3
in favour of Poonam Chand and Chandan
Rajasthan High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -