Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 8938 (1.26 seconds)

there is an equity between the parties arising from contract, fraud or trust provided that the decision of title ... relation was established on the ground of contract, trust or fraud, but in no case of which I am aware
Bombay High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 5 -
(1948) 50 BOMLR 49
- M Chagla
parties to a contract is caused by fraud, mis-representation or mistake etc., it is not a free consent ... Court held that if active concealment of fraud is established the contract would stand vitiated. The Court referred to Section
Gujarat High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 2 -
(1993) 1 GLR 66
- S Shah
caused'. A party to a contract, whose consent was caused by fraud or misrepresentation, may, if he thinks fit 'insist ... fraudulent party cannot build any rights an a contract obtained by fraud though it is open to the deceived party
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 32 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1963 All 459
- Mukerji
marriage. Hence. where marriage has been contracted by way of fraud , how we should provide effect ive relief ... vehemently support the idea that the definition of 'fraud' given under Contract Act, should not be applied to a Hindu
Central India Law Quarterly
- Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Cached
herein and alternatively having claimed that the contract was vitiated by fraud, the court should not under Section ... itself would not disclose that the contract was vitiated by fraud. That the averments by the appellants that they have
Bombay High Court
- Cites 24 - Cited by 1 - F Rebello
India should, under the heading 'fraud' apply the ordinary principles applicable to ordinary contracts and if on applying those principles ... Section 19 that his consent was obtained by fraud, In other words, Mr. Sethna submitted that the question
Bombay High Court
- Cites 30 - Cited by 1 -
(1976) 78 BOMLR 85
- Gandhi
Fraud and Mistake" in Chapter-I dealing with contract induced by fraud said that such contract is voidable ... party defrauded. The fact that the contract has been induced by fraud does not make the contract void, or prevent
Bombay High Court
- Cites 23 - Cited by 1 -
2003 (2) BomCR 7
- V Daga
challenged on the same ground as a contract. Fraud which would vitiate a contract has been defined under Section ... willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 2003 All 337
- J Sahai
being prejudicial to another. In Black's Legal Dictionary, "fraud" is defined as an intentional perversion of truth ... fact. Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines "fraud" as act committed by a party to a contract
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 31 - Cited by 121 - A Pasayat
other law, unless the contract itself, or the permission of the Controller is vitiated by fraud. Absent such vitiating circumstance ... possession beyond that period. Parties are bound by their contract, as sanctioned by the Controller, and the provisions of Section
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 18 - Cited by 87 -
AIR 1992 SC 1555
- Thommen
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next