Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 932 (0.14 seconds)

Police Force Rules, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the 'CRPF Rules') made under the provisions of the Central Reserve Police ... Rules 112 to 116) was inserted in the CRPF Rules on December 21, 1966. The said Chapter bears the heading
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 12 - Cited by 22 -
1995 SCC (3) 300
- S Agrawal - Full Document
CRPF Act, 1949; read with Rule-27 of CRPF Rules, 1955." 2.7 On 22nd May, 1989, Shri Raghubir Singh, Assistant ... CRPF Act, 1949 read with Rule 27 of CRPF Rules, 1955. The Disciplinary Authority found that the charge against
Delhi High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Police Force Rules, 1955, (hereinafter referred to as 'the CRPF Rules'), and principles of natural justice. 2. Facts ... Rules, 1965 read with Rule 16(a) of the CRPF Rules, 1955. 3. The petitioner contends that the impugned proceedings
Andhra High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 0 -
2005 (6) ALD 408
- R Ranganathan - Full Document
concerned authority, in accordance with Rule 14 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 and the Verification Roll No. 1225 dated 29th ... CRPC Act, 1949 read with Rule 27(a) of CRPF Rules, 1955. It was also stipulated that in view
Delhi High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
time of its constitution BSF was governed by CRPF Rules, and for purpose of which, Chapter XV titled „Special Provisions ... relating to Border Security Force‟ was inserted in the CRPF Rules. On 02.09.1968 the Parliament enacted the Border Security Force
Delhi High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P Nandrajog - Full Document
respondents, however, submits that Rule 27 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "the CRPF Rules") provide ... thus submits that there is no provision in the CRPF Rules for providing a defence assistant. Learned counsel submits that
Delhi High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S K Kaul - Full Document
filed by the petitioner under Rule 29 of the CRPF Rules. 2. The petitioner has disclosed that he was enlisted ... preferred a statutory appeal under Rule 28 of the CRPF Rules on 31st March, 2011 to the Director General, CRPF
Delhi High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
respondents, however, submits that Rule 27 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ?the CRPF Rules?) provide ... thus submits that there is no provision in the CRPF Rules for providing a defence assistant. Learned counsel submits that
Delhi High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
thus appear that Rule 8(b)(i) of the CRPF Rules only governs the seniority as between Army Officers inter ... Delhi High Court has construed Rule 8 of the CRPF Rules to mean that Army Officers who are re-employed
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 5 - Cited by 14 - A Pasayat - Full Document
power and authority under Rule 27 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 because punishment of removal from service against a "constable ... CRPF as defined under Rule 2 (b) of the CRPF Rules, 1955, or the DIGP of the force
Delhi High Court
- Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - P Nandrajog - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next