1 - 10 of 1522 (0.96 seconds)
Magistrate, if violative of fundamental right to
protection against double jeopardy-Constitution of India,
Art. 20(2)-Sea Customs ... Courts below infringed
the constitutional protection against double jeopardy
afforded by Art. 20(2) Of the Constitution.
Held
Supreme Court of India
unfitness to hold the
higher post and amounts to double jeopardy.
11. On the other hand, Mr. Ajesh Luthra, learned ... later on punished would not amount to double jeopardy, as held by the
Apex Court in Union of India
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi
proceedings against the
appellant in India would amount to double jeopardy,
the learned Special Judge, Mumbai, rejected the
appellant ... also
praying for interim bail on the ground of double
jeopardy. On 13th September, 2007, a complaint was
filed
Supreme Court of India
Constitution of India. The principle of double
jeopardy is attracted in the present case and discharge is vitiated ... there is no question of
applicability of principle of double jeopardy. The sentence of an
offence is entirely different thing
Allahabad High Court
acquitted as yet and as such
the applicability of double jeopardy cannot be pleaded in the facts of the
instant ... same
cause of action and amounts to double jeopardy. It is also submitted that the
Magistrate wrongly dismissed his application
Delhi High Court
Information Report would offend the constitutional protection given against double jeopardy.
4. This petition was originally filed against the first ... amounts to an invasion of the constitutional protection against double jeopardy in addition to the same being malafide and abuse
Madras High Court
Constitution of
India. The principle of double jeopardy would apply and the prosecution
in the criminal court is incompetent ... Shri Roy Chacko contends that while
considering cases of double jeopardy what the court has to see is the
substance
Kerala High Court
bail, the petitioner sought to raise
the point of double jeopardy and illegality in prosecuting the
petitioner once the petitioner ... offence more than
once. It incorporates the rule against double jeopardy. But it is
different from the one found
Bombay High Court
Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Patan, on the plea of double jeopardy for the reason that
the appellant has already been tried ... offence. In the facts of the
case, doctrine of double jeopardy is attracted. The High Court
dismissed the said application
Supreme Court of India
petitioner has tried to
invoke the rule of double jeopardy despite the fact that the two
complaints are for different ... present petition does not make out a case of
double jeopardy as provided for under Section
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -