1 - 10 of 4163 (1.02 seconds)
same.
The appellant for no fault has been punished sub-silencio.
[667F-H, 668A, D-E, 669H ... misconduct or there was some misconduct or double
punishment was already imposed. Rule 27 (19) casts an
obligation upon
Supreme Court of India
Plaintiff contends that the order of dismissal amounted to
double punishment right of the Plaintiff under Article ... contends that this was a case of
"double punishment". It is not denied that the State had a right
Bombay High Court
Section
282-A of the Companies Act provides a double punishment in that it
provides for a fine not exceeding ... interpreted as to say that it provides for a double punishment for one
and the same offence.
It provides
Madras High Court
petitioner, dealership of the petitioner was terminated which
is double punishment. The punishment is contrary to the Market
Discipline Guidelines ... relevant clause in dealership agreement. Awarding double
punishment for the same offence can not be justified by any means,
which
Calcutta High Court
offence that he could not again be
subjected to double punishment.
The Appeal filed by the Appellant has been dismissed ... Division Bench that there was no double punishment as the earlier
proposal had not been approved by the Registrar
Supreme Court of India
such punishment is
not only illegal but also constitutes double punishment, that a copy of
the report of the three ... construction, and cannot be said to be a
double punishment. Learned Counsel, in support of his contention that
imposition
Andhra High Court
same irregularities would
according to the petitioner, amount to double punishment to the
petitioner. The petitioner also pointed out that
Bombay High Court
accordance with the rules and not by way of punishment. He
had no right to the post held ... because to do so would
amount to imposing double punishment. He denied the charge
relating to misconduct and submitted that
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors vs Sughar Singh on 22
Supreme Court of India
Press, Collier Mac
Millan Publishers. London and Friedland in "Double
Jeoparady" (Oxford 1969) referred to.
6(i) The policy ... value of fifty rupees or
upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment of either
description for a term which may extend
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -