1 - 10 of 8916 (1.24 seconds)
respondent later left for USA and
obtained an exparte divorce order against Bhagyawanti in the
trial court at Oakland ... mother-appellant. A divorce decree was
passed exparte on 23.9.1983. On 20.2.84 the child reached
India with the appellant
Supreme Court of India
defendants except the 23rd defendant who was declared exparte be
exonerated from the suit with the respective properties in their ... contested. Apparently, as the 23rd defendant
was exparte, they did not exonerate his property from the suit. It was
suggested
Madras High Court
caused in filing the petition to set aside the exparte decree along with the said petition.
2. Heard ... paper publication was ordered against the petitioner and the exparte decree was also passed against him. He would further submit
Madras High Court
days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree.
2. Heard Mr.K.Selvaraj, the learned counsel ... filed the application to set aside the exparte preliminary decree, even though he had a knowledge about the exparte preliminary
Madras High Court
Civil Procedure requesting the Court to set aside the
exparte decree submitting that on August 6, 1977 when the
suit ... decree-holder contested the
application for setting aside the exparte decree inter alia
contending that there was non-compliance with
Supreme Court of India
days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree passed ... before the lower Court on 5.6.2006, he was set exparte and an exparte decree was passed on 12.06.2006 against
Madras High Court
days in filing the Petition to set aside the
exparte Preliminary Decree.
3. Since common points for determination arise ... file of the
Sub Court, Namakkal for partition. Exparte Preliminary Decree was
passed on 04.01.1995.
I.A. No. 11/1995
Madras High Court
appearance of appellant, the suit was decreed exparte in the year 2002. The appellants filed application ... aside the exparte Decree passed against them, which was allowed on cost of Rs.25,000/-. Aggrieved over the same
Madras High Court
that his
counsel did not inform him. Therefore, an exparte decree was passed on
13.04.2005 and subsequently ... days
in filing an application to set aside the exparte decree, dated 13.04.2005.
7. He further states that
Madras High Court
aside the exparte order passed against him in O.S.No.89 of 2003 dated 05.04.2005 and also another ... therefore, the defendants 2, 3 and 6 was set exparte and the suit was decreed as prayed for, apart from
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -