Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Document Types
1 - 10 of 439 (0.47 seconds)

Bench of this Court for consideration:- (1) Whether the family pension is liable to be deducted out of the compensation ... month. Due to his death, his wife is getting family pension of Rs. 440/- per month. The Tribunal held relying
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 2 -
I (1998) ACC 689
- R Raveendran - Full Document
noticed that the appellants are entitled to family pension and the Tribunal had not taken that family pension amount into ... were heard on the question as to whether the family pension due to the petitioners should or should not have
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 1 -
2 (1993) ACC 536
- Venkataraman - Full Document
justified in not taking into account the amount of family pension, provident fund and the gratuity, the collateral benefits received ... amounts received by the claimants in respect of Family Pension, provident Fund and Gratuity? 10. P. W. 3 Shylakumar
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 7 - Cited by 1 -
AIR 1981 Kant 129
- V Rao - Full Document
late Ramaswamy nominated the plaintiffs for purposes of his family pension and other benefits and despite all this, defendants ... finding given by the lower Court with reference to Family Pension allowable to the members of the family of deceased
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 -
II (1993) DMC 133
- N Bhat - Full Document
error in not making an order fixing the family pension of the petitioner and also to release the family pension ... November 16, 1995 and para 44 which repealed the Family Pension Scheme, 1971, (for short 'the scheme') and therefore, notwithstanding
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 0 -
(2000) IIILLJ 79 Kant
- M Chinnappa - Full Document
Government servant rendered service to compensate which a family pension scheme is devised, the widow and the dependent minors would ... equally entitled to the family pension as a matter of right. In fact, we look upon pension not merely
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 9 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 1997 KAR 302
- H Dattu - Full Document
first respondent, for grant of family pension under the CCS Pension Rules ('Rules' or 'Pensiori Rules' for short). The said ... praying for grant of family pension by taking into account, the continuous service of 19 years rendered by her husband
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 2003 KAR 1595
- Full Document
direction to the respondent to grant the family pension under Swathantratha Sainik Samman Pension Scheme to her treating ... said late Venkanna Hamanna Nayak applied for grant of family pension under the Scheme both to State and Central Governments
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 2003 Kant 54
- P V Shetty - Full Document
short, 'the Rules'), which provide for payment of family pension postulates that family pension is payable to the spouse ... Babu, she was alone entitled for the benefit of family pension. 6. Defendant No.2 filed her written statement contending
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - B.S.Patil - Full Document
petitioner applied to the first respondent to settle the family pension due to the family of the deceased Abdul Sattar ... short is that despite the collection of contribution to Family Pension Fund from March, 1971, the pensionary benefit is illegally
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 1997 KAR 1201
- Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -