Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
1 - 10 of 631 (0.92 seconds)

Rule 31 of CPC. (B) KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SERVANTS (FAMILY PENSION) RULES, 1964--Who are entitled to the benefit under these ... rules? The Family Pension Scheme is in the nature of a Welfare scheme framed by the Government to provide relief
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - Padmaraj - Full Document
late Ramaswamy nominated the plaintiffs for purposes of his family pension and other benefits and despite all this, defendants ... finding given by the lower Court with reference to Family Pension allowable to the members of the family of deceased
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 19 - Cited by 0 -
II (1993) DMC 133
- N Bhat - Full Document
Bench of this Court for consideration:- (1) Whether the family pension is liable to be deducted out of the compensation ... month. Due to his death, his wife is getting family pension of Rs. 440/- per month. The Tribunal held relying
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 17 - Cited by 0 -
I (1998) ACC 689
- R Raveendran - Full Document
Government servant rendered service to compensate which a family pension scheme is devised, the widow and the dependent minors would ... equally entitled to the family pension as a matter of right. In fact, we look upon pension not merely
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 9 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 1997 KAR 302
- H Dattu - Full Document
therefrom on the ground that the claimant was getting family pension, it assessed the net loss of dependency ... Tribunal has illegally made the deduction of family pension. It has been so held in the case of Helen
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 7 - Cited by 0 -
2001 ACJ 1965
- H N Tilhari - Full Document
claimant/appellant No. 1 was also getting the family pension of Rs. 600 per month and after the death ... amount of family pension which the claimant was awarded has to be deducted and on that basis, the Tribunal found
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 0 -
2001 ACJ 1340
- H N Tilhari - Full Document
noticed that the appellants are entitled to family pension and the Tribunal had not taken that family pension amount into ... were heard on the question as to whether the family pension due to the petitioners should or should not have
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 -
2 (1993) ACC 536
- Venkataraman - Full Document
petitioner applied to the first respondent to settle the family pension due to the family of the deceased Abdul Sattar ... short is that despite the collection of contribution to Family Pension Fund from March, 1971, the pensionary benefit is illegally
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - V M Kumar - Full Document
error in not making an order fixing the family pension of the petitioner and also to release the family pension ... November 16, 1995 and para 44 which repealed the Family Pension Scheme, 1971, (for short 'the scheme') and therefore, notwithstanding
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 0 -
(2000) IIILLJ 79 Kant
- M Chinnappa - Full Document
direction to the respondent to grant the family pension under Swathantratha Sainik Samman Pension Scheme to her treating ... said late Venkanna Hamanna Nayak applied for grant of family pension under the Scheme both to State and Central Governments
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 2003 Kant 54
- P V Shetty - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -