1 - 10 of 92586 (3.64 seconds)
that mere marking of the documents by the petitioner does not
amount to proving the contents therein, that the contents ... documents Exs.P3 to P9 would not conclusively prove that 1st respondent belongs
to Kshatriya community and the charge
Andhra High Court
states that all facts except the contents of documents, may be proved
by oral evidence. Section 65, under the heading ... that a certified copy of a
public document proved prima facie the truth of its contents. He relied
upon Chapter
Bombay High Court
Official Assignee.
2. The witnesses who could have proved those documents and the contents
thereof would have been Deshpande ... Somjee replied urging that the usual mode of
proving documents was by calling the writer or by the testimony
Bombay High Court
Exts. 3 and
7. The plaintiffs filed these documents to prove the existence of the
custom pleaded.
Exhibit ... Evidence Act, which runs as
follows:
"Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is
produced from
Orissa High Court
official
Assignee. The witnesses who could have proved those documents and the
contents thereof would have been Deshpande, the managing ... case was, whether the authorship of the document
can be proved without adducing evidence in proof of the signature
Bombay High Court
marked by consent,
only the execution of the document is proved and not the contents and
therefore, to prove ... seller. According to the learned counsel, though certain
documents to prove the value of the site were filed before
Madras High Court
party,
namely, the plaintiffs from adducing evidence to prove the document?
5. Mr. N. C. Pati, learned counsel appearing ... rejection
of the plaintiffs prayer to examine witnesses to prove documents was
not a "case decided" within the meaning
Orissa High Court
employer must necessarily
bring oral evidence to prove the documents relied in the charge-sheet
and to prove the charges ... correctness of the documents or unless
the documents are proved, they cannot be relied upon. In the oral
enquiry, what
Allahabad High Court
attesting witnesses who has been examined has not proved the
document. For the present, it is sufficient to mention that ... support the
plaintiff, hence the document has not been proved.
20. PW 9 Nemi Chandra Jain is an attesting witness
Madhya Pradesh High Court
raising of a presumption as to documents purporting or proved
to be 30 years old.
Where any document purporting ... shall then be
admissible for the purpose of proving that the document has been duly
registered in a manner provided
Bombay High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -