1 - 10 of 1079 (0.99 seconds)
following grounds:-
(1) that the respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage and at the time
Central Government Act
relate,to theexistence of grounds fornullity. Thus, for
example, impotance isa ground for nullity inIrish lawbut notin Australia,
Like wise ... would clearly appear to tall within this cat-
egory.
Impotence:
Impotence is a ground ornullity which renders a marriage voidable
Central India Law Quarterly
Conditions
for divorce on grounds of impotence, invincible repugnance
to sexual act and inability to consummate marriage though
neither party ... proved impotent.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant married the respondent according to Hindu
rites on April 20, 1955. Thereafter the parties lived
Supreme Court of India
marriage has not been consummated owing to the impotency of the
respondent refused to have sexual intercourse saying that ... concerning the respondent, in any
event, the respondent was impotent at the relevant time, and there was
non-consummation
Bombay High Court
prove that
her husband the respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage and
at the time ... clear from the evidence that the husband was
not impotent as regards all women, but it is alleged
Bombay High Court
void on the ground that the respondent
was impotent at the time of the marriage and at the time ... wife. Her case is that the
respondent is impotent relatively to her. As regards the birth of
the child
Bombay High Court
Criminal Procedure, 1973-Section (3)-Scope of-
Husband's impotence to have sexual relations with his wife-
Whether a just ... Metropolitan Magistrate,
upheld her allegation that the appellant was impotent and
was incapable of having sexual relations with his wife
Supreme Court of India
India today?. If wild,
reckless and baseless allegations of impotency and lack of manliness
are made in the written statement ... stated that it was the husband who was impotent
and was unable to consummate the marriage
Bombay High Court
able to do sexual
intercourse because of his impotency. In 1957 the appellant's cousin
sister Shashi came to stay ... were to be found the
respondent is not impotent within the meaning of the Act, yet if it is
proved
Delhi High Court
text thus:"An out-cast and his son, an impotent person, one lame, a
madman, an idiot, one born blind ... father, or other
owner of property, neither an impotent man, nor a person afflicted with
elephantiasis, nor a madman
Bombay High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -