1 - 10 of 2236 (1.08 seconds)
Shri Pallav
Shishodia, learned senior counsel appearing for the intervenor-cum-
promoter - M/s. Chiripal Textile Mills Private Limited submitted ... submit fresh revised offers. While adjourning the case, the intervenor-cum-
promoter was directed to deposit a Demand Draft
Supreme Court of India
learned senior counsel Shri P.P. Rao for the intervenor who is
a prospective direct recruit candidate for the said ... learned Senior
Counsel Shri P.P. Rao, for the intervenor, submitted that the High
Court had misinterpreted the ratio
Supreme Court of India
SREI International
Finance Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Intervenor') under
Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section ... 2005 is another
application moved on behalf of the Intervenor under Section 151 of the
CPC seeking clarification
Delhi High Court
considered.
9. On March 30, 1970 three intervenors, viz., (1) Shri Ishak Baba
Kadwaikar (2) Moula Miya Muhtyar Miya ... care to record any statements on behalf of the
first intervenor Ishak Babamiya Kadwaikar. He had also filed an
objection
Bombay High Court
WPMP.No.9041/06) .. Intervenor / Respondent
W.P.NO.7736 of 2006
Walter I. Davaram
S/o.T.N. Davaram ... WPMP.Nos.8974 & 9020/06) .. Intervenors /
Respondents
W.P.NO.7782 of 2006
State of Tamil Nadu
Madras High Court
Bench: T Sen
ORDER
Tapen Sen, J.
1. The Intervenor Application is allowed.
2. Heard Ms. Ruby Parween, learned counsel ... petitioners and Mr.
Sunil Kumar learned counsel for the intervenor and Mr. Azeemuddin,
learned
Jharkhand High Court
Kapoor. Mr.
Pratap Chatterjee appeared on behalf of the intervenor Export
Inspection Agency and supported Mr. Kapoor and Mr. Bachawat ... Bhaskar Sen, appearing on behalf of the intervenor New India
Assuarance, also supported Mr. Kapoor.
5. I may now refer
Calcutta High Court
Advocate Shri Deshpande, for the applicant intervenor
stated that he would be filing his case law/reliances by 2nd July ... opportunity to the
petitioners. On 7-7-2004, the intervenor-applicant filed his written
notes of arguments and again
Bombay High Court
filed by two applicants. The intervenors had
objected the prayer made by the petitioners ... because of helmets. It was, therefore, prayed by
the intervenors that they should be allowed to intervene in the main
Bombay High Court
through tenant.
32. In the said application, the said intervenors, further made an
averment that they have been realising rent ... rejoinder to
the aforementioned application filed by the intervenors purported to be
under Order I, Rule 10, Sub-rule
Patna High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -