Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
All
Years
1 - 10 of 90801 (1.06 seconds)

State of Haryana and Another reported at (2012) 340 ITR 1 (SC) is misconstrued as the judgement was rendered with ... reported at (2001) 118 Taxman 276 (Guj.) :: (2001) 250 ITR 542 (Guj.). 4.1. On the contrary, ld.Sr.DR supported
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad
- Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Yamaha Motor India Pvt. Ltd., New ... vs Assessee on 29
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi
- Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
case of S. Alagarsamy vs. ITO (296 ITR 43) wherein their Lordships held that payment ... Kamini CIT vs. Smt. G.A. Samantha Kamini (259 ITR 215) (Mad). Relying on the above judicial decisions
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
case of S. Alagarsamy vs. ITO (296 ITR 43) wherein their Lordships held that payment ... Kamini CIT vs. Smt. G.A. Samantha Kamini (259 ITR 215) (Mad). Relying on the above judicial decisions
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
case of S. Alagarsamy vs. ITO (296 ITR 43) wherein their Lordships held that payment ... Kamini CIT vs. Smt. G.A. Samantha Kamini (259 ITR 215) (Mad). Relying on the above judicial decisions
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
case of S. Alagarsamy vs. ITO (296 ITR 43) wherein their Lordships held that payment ... Kamini CIT vs. Smt. G.A. Samantha Kamini (259 ITR 215) (Mad). Relying on the above judicial decisions
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Yamaha Motor India Pvt. Ltd., New ... vs Assessee on 29
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi
- Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Director of Income-tax [2011] 332 ITR 340 (Delhi), in the following terms (page ... ITR
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
case of Abhishek industries vs. CIT (286 ITR 1) P&H, the interest expenses are not allowable ... Malabar Industries Co. Ltd. vs. CIT (2000) 243 ITR 83 (SC) and other relevant cases, we are of the considered
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Naresh T Wadhwani, Pune vs Assessee on 28 October, 2014
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next