1 - 10 of 3488 (0.37 seconds)
held to be directory in nature,
but in holding that the Rules of Business are mandatory?
17
7 Whether
Supreme Court of India
such corrupt practice and the particulars
thereof is mandatory or directory. It is obvious that if it is held
that ... that:
"With respect to the question of mandatory and directory operation
as with any question of statutory construction, the primary
Madhya Pradesh High Court
relevant State for publication of tax proposals whether
directory for mandatory-Effect of publication of
notification imposing tax in Government ... immaterial to
consider whether s. 131(3) is directory or mandatory or to
read it as partly one and partly
Supreme Court of India
High Court-Substantial compliance.
Interpretation-Rule of-Statute mandatory or directory
depends upon intent and not language ... always important to bear the distinction
between mandatory and directory provisions of 3 statute. The
general rule of interpretation
Supreme Court of India
supplied within ten days, is mandatory or directory and it was held as
under:
There are no ready tests ... invariable formulas to determine whether
a provision is mandatory or directory. The broad purpose of the
statute is important
Supreme Court of India
compliance of a provision of law mandatory or directory in nature.
In view of the observations made by the Full ... Section 87-A (3) of the Act are mandatory or directory. No universal
rule can be laid down
Allahabad High Court
supplied within ten days, is mandatory or
directory and it was held as under: (SCC pp. 486-87, para ... invariable
formulae to determine whether a provision is
mandatory or directory. The broad purpose of
the statute is important
Supreme Court of India
would necessarily depend upon whether the provisions are mandatory or
directory. If the provisions are mandatory in that case even ... whether an enactment
shall be considered directory or mandatory except that language alone
most often is not decisive, and regard
Bombay High Court
provision of Section 7 of the Act is directory and not
mandatory and as both Rangbari and Umedganj were declared ... duty and its exercise must be regarded as directory and not mandatory.
In this connection, he cited the decisions
Rajasthan High Court
employed
to determine whether the provision is mandatory or directory in character, is
whether non-compliance of the particular provision ... mandatory in character.
18. Whether the statute is mandatory or directory, it depends upon
the intent and object
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -