1 - 10 of 2415 (1.02 seconds)
appellant on
the ground of non-joinder of necessary parties.
Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this appeal ... dismissal of the original petition for non-joinder of
necessary party.
It is the common experience that when a patient
Supreme Court of India
above. The
suit therefore, is bad for non-joinder of
necessary parties. The plaintiff having been
married prior ... Whether the suit is bad of non-joinder of
necessary parties?
5. Whether the Hindu Women's Right to
Property
Karnataka High Court
replication was filed denying the plea of
non-joinder of necessary parties. The fact that the
appellants' father ... defect of non-joinder of necessary
party; and because Munni Devi is a necessary party and has
to be impleaded
Supreme Court of India
same was also not bad for non-joinder of necessary parties and
no notice under Section 80 of the Code ... held that the suit was bad for
non-joinder of necessary parties, namely, the workmen, who will be
really affected
Madras High Court
again
raised.
26. Insofar as non-Joinder or mis-joinder of necessary parties, the
learned Counsel for the appellant relies ... Procedure and submits that objection
regarding non-joinder or mis-joinder of necessary party is to be taken
Calcutta High Court
contended that the suit is bad for
non-joinder of necessary parties as all partners of the firm were ... joinder of necessary parties as defendant No. 2 Fakruddin who was
not a partner is not necessary party
Bombay High Court
consideration is
whether the grandsons are necessary parties and whether their
non-joinder is fatal to the present suit ... that a suit has to fail for non-joinder of
necessary parties, it would be for the defendant who sets
Madras High Court
contending that the
objection as to non-joinder of necessary parties can be taken at any
stage of the proceedings ... question that the suit was bad for non-joinder of necessary parties.
When the very existence of co-owner
Madras High Court
liable to be
dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties namely Lourenco Manual
Pereira the appellant's husband and whether ... nothing in this section shall apply to non-joinder of necessary
parties. Shri Kakodkar has placed reliance on the case
Bombay High Court
liable to be rejected on account of non-joinder of necessary parties. Thus,
both on the ground of delay ... ground of non-joinder of
necessary parties, the Tribunal rejected the petitioner's said O.A.
11. The learned counsel
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -