1 - 10 of 130969 (6.73 seconds)
aside the abatement, are no longer good law.
22. In B. Venkataperayya v. (5. Adi-lakshamma ... 22, Rule 4 gives a party a right to get the legal
representatives brought on record; Rule 9 of Order
Andhra High Court
Babhutdan. Yet, a third
application was moved under Order 22 Rule 9 on the same day praying for
setting aside ... under the
special law for an application under Order 22, Rule 4 and Order 22 Rule
Rajasthan High Court
22, Rule 4 are wide enough to include the case
even after abatement. The words occurring in Sub-rule (4 ... opinion that the
stage of passing the order under Order 22, Rule 4 (4) is the stage when
the abatement
Patna High Court
Rule 4(4) of CPC and requested the trial court to exercise its power under Order 22 Rule ... rule(3). Sub-rule(4) provides an exception to sub-rule(3). Under sub-rule(4), it is open
Madras High Court
event, according to Mr. Ganju, even
under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC the right of newly impleaded respondent to
file ... :-
"4. This Court in Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash [AIR 1986 SC
1952] has said thus:
"The sub-rule
Delhi High Court
event, according to Mr. Ganju, even
under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC the right of newly impleaded respondent to
file ... :-
"4. This Court in Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash [AIR 1986 SC
1952] has said thus:
"The sub-rule
Delhi High Court
event, according to Mr. Ganju, even
under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC the right of newly impleaded respondent to
file ... :-
"4. This Court in Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash [AIR 1986 SC
1952] has said thus:
"The sub-rule
Delhi High Court
event, according to Mr. Ganju, even
under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC the right of newly impleaded respondent to
file ... :-
"4. This Court in Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash [AIR 1986 SC
1952] has said thus:
"The sub-rule
Delhi High Court
event, according to Mr. Ganju, even
under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC the right of newly impleaded respondent to
file ... :-
"4. This Court in Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash [AIR 1986 SC
1952] has said thus:
"The sub-rule
Delhi High Court
event, according to Mr. Ganju, even
under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC the right of newly impleaded respondent to
file ... :-
"4. This Court in Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash [AIR 1986 SC
1952] has said thus:
"The sub-rule
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -