Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 282135 (8.66 seconds)

Vaniyars of Tiruchendur. They have obtained permission under Order 1, Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code ... brought with the permission of the Court under Order 1, Rule 8 thereof. The Explanation does not become inapplicable because
Madras High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 11 -
(1928) 54 MLJ 8
- Ramesam
Rule 1 of the CPC are mandatory or directory in nature, we need to consider the provisions under Order 8 ... Order 8 Rule 1 of the CPC, we are unable to hold that the provisions under Order 8 Rule
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 3 - Cited by 9
here that the previous suit was brought under Order 1, Rule 8 but the defendants objected that the suit ... circumstances of this case bring it under Order 1, Rule 8. The Secretary of the Brahma Samaj is here suing
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 8 -
AIR 1929 Cal 445
- Suhrawardy
Order 8, Rule 1 and on failure to file written statement within 90 days under amended Rule 1, Order ... compliance of Order 8, Rule 1 penal consequences in Rule 5 and Rule 10 are contemplated where the Court
Bombay High Court
- Cites 16 - Cited by 6 -
2004 (5) BomCR 573
- A Shah
have filed his written statement, as required by Rule 1, Order 8, Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred ... Rule 10, Order 8, cannot be passed when a defendant fails to file written statement under Rule 1, Order
Patna High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1961 Pat 152
- R K Prasad
Code is different from a suit filed under Order 1, Rule-8 of Civil Procedure Code. We do not agree ... under Sec. 92, C.P.C. Permission under Order 1, Rule 8, C.P.C. may be granted even after
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1994 Mad 43
careful reading of the language in which order, 8 Rule 1 has been drafted, shows that it casts an obligation ... Order 8, Rule 10 which provides that where any party from whom a written statement is required under Rule 1
Gauhati High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 3 -
AIR 2007 Gau 5
- I Ansari
1 and 2, it is contended that the written statement is clearly beyond the period prescribed under Order 8, Rule ... Order 8, Rule 1 which came to be substituted by the Act of 1999, read as under: "1. Written statement
Bombay High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 3 -
2003 (4) MhLj 1034
- F Rebello
amending Order 8, under the Act 46 of 1999, no time limit was contemplated either under Order 8 Rule ... 1 or under Order 8 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure for filing written statement. With a view
Madras High Court
- Cites 25 - Cited by 3
filing written statement beyond the period prescribed under Order 8, Rule 1, recourse cannot be taken to the provisions ... combined reading of the provisions of Rule 1, Rule 9, Rule 10 of Order 8 and Order 9, Rule
Bombay High Court
- Cites 29 - Cited by 2 -
2004 (5) BomCR 548
- D Bhosale
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next