1 - 10 of 161235 (6.00 seconds)
this Court on 14-3-1983 was an
order wholly without jurisdiction and hence, his client, the defendant,
was entitled ... payment of
arrears of compensation was not an order without jurisdiction at least
till 23rd August, 1983. The said order
Bombay High Court
said
order to show that the order was a consent order. However, the order
was given effect ... order is made by the Court without jurisdiction the order
becomes a nullity and is void, Mr. Mitra has relied
Calcutta High Court
under Section 7 [1) was an order without jurisdiction. Another
observation was that under Section 7 (1) the two conditions ... empowered to declare
the two orders in question as being without jurisdiction -- in other
words, whe- ther the plaintiffs' suit
Patna High Court
impugned order
directing the Society to change its name within two weeks is illegal
and without jurisdiction on the face ... authority acts without
jurisdiction and passes an order without jurisdiction, then a manifest
injustice is caused by assumption of power
Calcutta High Court
sale without jurisdiction. The order purporting to prohibit the sale
was, as I have said, an order without jurisdiction ... interim order ex parte
without notice to the plaintiffs. The defendant chose a procedure which
is without any jurisdiction
Calcutta High Court
well settled that an order without jurisdiction is a
nullity which can be ignored with impunity. This is the ratio ... Lahore High Court. It was found that the order
was without jurisdiction and the Full Bench by majority held that
Bombay High Court
jurisdiction has made an order under Order XXIII, Rule 1(2), in
circumstances not contemplated by the rule, the order ... made without jurisdiction. The Court has jurisdiction to
try the suit, and, in the exercise of that jurisdiction, is competent
Calcutta High Court
barred if the orders passed or the action
taken was without jurisdiction. It is only with regard to orders passed ... orders which are found to be without jurisdiction or
in excess of jurisdiction. In support of his argument Mr. Seervai
Bombay High Court
party and that
the order of the Board was without jurisdiction. The Board in the
counter filed on their behalf ... behalf of the appellants is that the order was
passed without jurisdiction and that therefore it is a nullity
Madras High Court
subsidiary contended that the order of July 29, 1968 was
without jurisdiction. In this appeal before us Shri Parpia further ... Companies Act and the order was thus
without jurisdiction ; and (b) The order being contrary to the
fundamental provisions
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -