Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
Courts
cat_ernakulam
81 - 90 of 376 (2.15 seconds)

aggrieved by the non-finalization of his pensionary benefits on the ground that departmental proceedings are pending against ... seeking also finalization of the pensionary benefits. After filing of this OA respondents issued the order dated 02.4.2008 appointing
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
respectively. They retired on superannuation without any pensionary benefits on 31.12.2005 and 31.3.2006 respectively. The case of the applicants ... Bearer on commission basis cannot be 3 counted for pensionary benefits. The applicants were originally engaged on contract basis therefore
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Grade Pay Rs.2400 and granted the pensionary benefits vide PPO No.0604207815. To support his contention he produced copy ... informed that on receipt of excess payment of pensionary benefits due to erroneous fixation of MACP benefit, the arrears
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Accounts, Thiruvananthapuram who is the competent authority for sanctioning pensionary benefits of the applicant is not in a position ... vacated, they are not in a position to sanction pensionary benefits of the applicant. They have also stated that
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
years of service is required for availing full pensionary benefits, he has only 23 years of total service under ... Government is also counted, he he may get full pensionary benefits. Applicant has, therefore, made the Annexure A-2 representation
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
short, the applicant was sanctioned and paid pension and pensionary benefits as per pre-revised pay. As regards provision ... that there is no delay in disbursement of the pensionary benefits in the pre-revised scale. Due to the subsequent
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
hearing, made a submission that in so far as pensionary benefits are concerned as there is a change inasmuch ... contributory pension scheme only and not for any pensionary benefits under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, the applicants may be considered
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
that pre-2006 retirees should be extended the same pensionary benefits as that of post 2006 retirees cannot be accepted ... post-2006 retirees cannot be extended the same pensionary benefits in as much as the respondents on the basis
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
regularisation effective from 10.3.97 and, therefore, entitled for pensionary benefits. The operative part of the order is as under ... effective from 10.3.97. He is therefore entitled to the pensionary benefits on the basis of total length of qualifying service
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
reads as under: "Removal of dismissal from service  No pensionary benefit may be granted to a Railway servant on whom ... Railway servant shall not exceed two-thirds of the pensionary benefits which would have been admissible
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
Previous  
5
6
7
8
9  
10
11
12
13
14
Next