1 - 10 of 39477 (2.72 seconds)
other
cause of action with a suit for recovery of immovable property would
come into operation even in cases where ... other hand, in a suit for recovery of immovable pro-pertv the
terminus is always a fixed one from either
Punjab-Haryana High Court
that Schedule runs in these words:
A suit for recovery of rent other than house rent, unless the Judge ... with authority to exercise
jurisdiction with respect to suits for recovery of rent, as required by
Clause (8) aforesaid
Calcutta High Court
industrial company is pending, then, among
others, no suit for recovery of money shall lie or be proceeded with
further ... respect of such an industrial company no civil `suit for recovery of
money' is maintainable and if it is pending
Delhi High Court
future, should have been included in the suit for recovery of
possession of immovable property and since the respondent herein ... SINGH v. PRITAM SINGH and
submitted that the suit for recovery of mesne profits instituted
subsequent to the suit
Madras High Court
shows that the cause of
action ior a suit for recovery of immovable property or possession is
not the same ... that the cause of action for a suit for recovery of
immovable property is not the same as the cause
Allahabad High Court
respondent No. 1 Electricity Board filed a
civil suit for recovery ... properties of the
industrial company and no suit for recovery of money etc. shall lie or
proceeded with except with
Punjab-Haryana High Court
appellant filed a suit for recovery of the excess,tax paid
within 3 years of the date of suit ... annas was illegal. The trial court decreed the suit for
recovery from the Municipal Committee of excess tax paid
Supreme Court of India
rent in respect of such
property.
Now, a suit for the recovery of licence fee or charges may lie either ... declaratory decree or an injunction, or a suit for
recovery of possession of immovable property camouflaged in the guise
Bombay High Court
wakf property situated in
Hyderabad lost in 1937--Suit for recovery filed in
1956--Suit whether filed within time--Indian ... there was
no limitation under it for a suit for recovery of
such .property. On April 1, 1951 the Part
Supreme Court of India
Section 13 (6) is that "no suit or proceeding for
recovery of possession shall be filed unless notice as required ... order to
enable the lessor to maintain a suit for recovery of possession of the
demised premises, the lessor must
Calcutta High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -