1 - 10 of 11770 (1.29 seconds)
India
Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules; 1958 insofar
as it tended to restrict pensioners to retirement benefits
to which ... entitled to payment of gratuity as a part of retirement
benefits at the rates specified in the Notification
Supreme Court of India
pension fund or provident fund or for the benefit of the employee under any law for the time being ... retrenchment compensation or any gratuity or other retirement benefit payable to the employee or any ex gratia payment made
Central Government Act
continue in
service with all existing service and retirement benefits till the age
of 60 years notwithstanding the provisions ... rules. Option once exercised shall
be final. Retirement benefits have been dealt with in Chapter IX of the
Rules
Kerala High Court
petitioners' case that before
1957 the only scheme for retirement benefits in the Railways
was the Provident Fund Scheme wherein ... count the officiat-
ing pay for the purpose of retirement benefits in case of
those who were in service
Supreme Court of India
VSNL), the assessees were
entitled to retirement benefits from OCS, which was retained by the
employer for seven years from ... this retained
amount being the retirement benefit, the ass'essees received interest,
which according to the assessing officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai
Rule 231 of
the Hyderabad Civil Service Rule-"Retirement benefits"
measuring of-Limits of judicial Review of Policy decisions ... floor of the House. [595A]
3.3 A review of retirement benefits would undoubtedly
cover the examination of the rules
Supreme Court of India
petitioner announced a pension scheme
as a third retirement benefit which was brought into force from January
1, 1961. Since ... pension
which is in addition to the existing two retirement benefits of
Provident Fund and Gratuity will be paid every
Bombay High Court
University to pay his pension and other retirement benefits on his
superannuation from the service of the University ... Admittedly, his pensionary benefits and other retirement
benefits are yet to be determined and finally paid
Patna High Court
Ranchi. 1st petitioner Basant Kumar after retirement having not
received the pensionery benefits had to move before this Court ... successor SEB's irrespective of their date of retirement.
This will be a temporary arrangement till and subject
Jharkhand High Court
said Corporation of Calcutta Employees'
(Death-cum-Retirement) Benefit Regulations of 1982 provides that the
Regulations are to come into ... Regulations of
the Corporation of Calcutta Employees' (Death-own-Retirement) Benefit
Regulations, 1982 to the petitioners by treating the date
Calcutta High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -