1 - 10 of 70890 (3.26 seconds)
liberty, he is not
entitled to the constitutional right to defend himself at
the trial by a legal practitioner ... arrest gives the arrested
man the constitutional right to defend himself in all
actions brought against him. Take the case
Supreme Court of India
thus deprives an impecunious defendant of his valuable right to
defend before he is deprived of his property. Therefore ... right.
(3) By depriving the defendant of the right to defend property
without a reasonable opportunity given in consonance With
Gujarat High Court
portion only of the Magistrate's order, viz., the defendants'
right to catch fish with small nets during the plaintiffs ... that portion of the
order which related to the defendants' right to use large nets during
their period. Accordingly
Calcutta High Court
inference that they had
got a permanent right. The defendants' plea therefore that
they were permanent tenants of the fishery ... course of the river, if any, the defendants'
right had in any way been affected. In order to appreciate
Supreme Court of India
consent of the plaintiffs. Subject to
this right of the defendants, he set aside the judgment and decree ... burden was upon the defendants to establish
the nature and extent of the right asserted. The Division Bench gave
effect
Patna High Court
that under the terms of the
policy the right to defend the claim proceeding has been reserved to
the insurer ... have been
satisfied. Clause (c) gives him the right to defend the action on the
ground that the policy
Orissa High Court
give a decision on the
question of the defendants' occupancy right irrespective the onus of
proof in such a suit ... given by this Court, again
assumed that the defendants' original right was that of tenants from
year to year
Madras High Court
that if persons go to a spot to defend their
right, there is nothing unlawful in the act of those ... right or supposed right". When people go
to defend their rights, that cannot be described as enforcing any right
Patna High Court
statement?
2 With the admitted facts, whether the rights of the defendants over
10" portion of the disputed wall could ... findings or the materials of the defendants
that any such right at any time was specifically exposed or notified
Andhra High Court
compromise decree Ex. A-1, under
which the defendants claim rights of occupancy, has not been registered
and is, therefore ... thus clear from the compromise petition that the defendants
claimed rights of occupancy and the compromise merely recognised the
permanent
Andhra High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -