1 - 10 of 73408 (4.23 seconds)
counsel, mere
enrolment which gives "a right to practice" is not enough to make a person ... According to the learned counsel, right to
practice is one thing and having practiced is another thing and, therefore
Supreme Court of India
secular aspect of a religious practice. The
petitioner challenged the right of the intervener
either to intervene ... adherents of certain essential tenets, doctrines
and practices; the right to such continuity
involves the right to enforce discipline
Supreme Court of India
hereinafter called as the
`Act 1970') have a right to practice in medical sciences.
(ii) As to whether ... would not
confer any person a right to practice or seeking
enrolment in the State Register;
(3) Section
Supreme Court of India
damages will
act as a deterrent to these prohibited practices right from
incipiency and motivate the producers and suppliers themselves ... aggrieved
consumer had no right to claim compensation in regard to restrictive
trade practices would be a negation
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
Association who have already graduated in acquired a right to practice
and the Bar Council is estopped from denying that ... said to bean unreasonable restriction on the right to
practice the profession of law, that it is not only arbitrary
Madras High Court
subject to which an advocate shall have the right
to practice as one of the functions of the Bar Council ... subject to which an advocate shall
have the right to practice as one of the functions of the Bar
Council
Allahabad High Court
Medicine in any State and the privileges (including right to practice any system of medicine) conferred by or under ... section (2) shall affect privileges (including the right to practice any system of medicine) conferred by or under
Madras High Court
defaulting advocates and passed the
orders suspending the right to practice. The relevant Rule 42 is being
reproduced below :--
"Rule ... show cause within a
month why his right to practice be not suspended. In case the
advocate pays the amount
Allahabad High Court
provision, which is directly in
conflict with their rights to practice as an advocate; before any court
including the Supreme ... Procedure)
Rules, 1982. It is contended that the right to practice before CESTAT
stood vested in the petitioners which could
Delhi High Court
Patents Act, 1970, has curtailed his right to practice, though as per Section 30 of the Advocates ... that the amendment is a clear violation of right to practice conferred on any Advocate, as contemplated under Section
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -