1 - 10 of 34996 (3.79 seconds)
Central Government Act Section 17(1)(c) in The Limitation Act, 1963
(c) the suit or application is for relief
Central Government Act
prescribed
period of limitation would get extended under Section 17, Limitation
Act, 1963 (corresponding to Section 18, Limitation ... Section
17, Limitation Act, 1963, insofar as it is material for the present
case, reads :
"17. Effect of fraud
Himachal Pradesh High Court
view of the matter the provisions
of Section 17 of the Limitation Act are clearly attracted and the
limitation shall ... petitioners could not take any
advantage of Section 17 of the Limitation Act as the Company
Petition did not contain
Supreme Court of India
Central Government Act Section 17(2) in The Limitation Act, 1963
(2) Where a judgment- debtor has, by fraud
Central Government Act
sufficient cause. Section 17 of the Railway Claims Tribunal
Act, 1987 reads as follows:
17. Limitation.- (1) The Claims Tribunal ... clear that Section 17(1) is applicable only if limitation is
prescribed by the Limitation Act and not under
Kerala High Court
date on
which the right accrues. Section 17 of the Limitation Act provides
that where fraud or mistake has occurred ... instant
case, considering the provisions contained in section 17 of the
Limitation Act, it must be held that there
Gujarat High Court
Code, 1908, the issue regarding limitation can be or
requires to be tried first ?"
17. This basic question requires ... While referring to the provisions contained under section 3 of
the Limitation Act, 1963, I have noticed that there
Gujarat High Court
would have been entitled to compensation under Section 70
of the Indian Contract Act if he had adduced evidence ... plaintiff's right to claim refund under Section 72 of the
Contract Act, and also to the question whether
Andhra High Court
Limitation Act do not apply and the petitioner is not entitled to
protection either under Section 5 or under Section ... Limitation Act to the
proceedings under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act.
In the decision of Aparna
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Whether the box covered under safe deposit receipt No.
17/47was entrusted to the defendant No. 1 duly sealed ... limitation. There is no controversy that the limitation for
the present suit is governed by Article 70 of theLimitation Act
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -