1 - 10 of 4391 (1.11 seconds)
Delhi Rent Act, 1995
28. Restrictions on subletting.
(1) Where at any time before the 9th day of June
Central Government Act
whose
contractual tenancy did not specifically authorise him to
sublet or grant lease, could not create a valid licence
before
Supreme Court of India
arrears of rent. The suit was decreed.
However, Maneklal sublet a part of the premises in his
occupation ... contractual
tenancy was in law not competent to sublet the premises in
whole or in part and a person claiming
Supreme Court of India
monthly
rental of Rs.3500/-. DTC has sublet/assigned the
premises in favour of respondent No.1, Municipal
Corporation ... held that
respondent no.1 (DTC) has either sublet,
assigned or otherwise parted with the
possession of the tenanted premises
Supreme Court of India
conditions and convenants
herein contained be entitled to sublet or
under let the demised premises or any part 'or
portion ... appellant
company in taking the lease and subletting the demised
premises were undertaken with the object of doing business
Supreme Court of India
Lessee in legal possession-Held not enough to
prove subletting. High Court--Whether could reappraise
evidence in revision.
Partnership ... name
of firm 'A' had been unlawfully sublet in major part to
defendants 2 to 5 who were running business
Supreme Court of India
Transfer of tenancy right
under the lease/subletting, meaning of - Whether the
voluntary amalgamation by virtue of the provisions ... appellant company terminating the
tenancy on the ground of subletting and/or transfer and
assignment of the interest of appellant
Supreme Court of India
Finding by lower appellate court that landlord acquiesced in
subletting--Whether High Court could interfere on the ground ... that the
respondent land lord had acquiesced in the subletting. The
trial judge decreed the suit holding that the respondent
Supreme Court of India
eviction of the petitioner on
the ground of subletting. This application was allowed on
29th August, 1974 by the Addl ... established
on record that the premises had been sublet by the
petitioner in contravention of the prohibitory provisions
Supreme Court of India
allegations
made by the landlady. The allegations of subletting by him
in favour of respondents ... accepted by the landlady. On the question
of subletting the Controller came to the conclusion that the
tenant Dev Kumar
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -