Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 14228 (1.41 seconds)

statementto be amended. If the High Court or the Supreme C Case before High Court to be heard
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 253
prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 181
Supreme Court of India State Of Bombay vs Supreme General Films Exchange ... on 22 April, 1960 Equivalent citations ... PETITIONER: STATE OF BOMBAY Vs. RESPONDENT: SUPREME GENERAL FILMS EXCHANGE LTD.(with connected appeal) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/04/1960
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 13 - Cited by 103 -
1960 AIR 980
Lok Sabha Debates SHORT DURATION DISCUSSIONS (RULE-193): Further Discussion On Need ... on 4 December
Lok Sabha Debates
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0
Supreme Court of India Official Liquidator, Supreme ... vs P. A. Tendolkar (Dead) By L. Rs. And ... on 19 January ... Bench: Beg, M Hameedullah PETITIONER: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, SUPREME BANK LTD. Vs. RESPONDENT: P. A. TENDOLKAR (DEAD
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 25 - Cited by 53 -
1973 AIR 1104
Court of India Union Of India And Ors. vs Supreme Steels & General Mills And ... on 15 October, 2001 Equivalent
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 2 - Cited by 47 -
AIR 2001 SC 2987
- B Kumar
will of the people and what he says is supreme, should anybody believe that or should we believe that? Otherwise ... that what the Speaker has done is supreme and no court can intervene on it?  Take the example
Lok Sabha Debates
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0
meet the deficiencies pointed out by the Hon'ble Supreme Coun in its decisions on the subject by suggesting measures
Law Commission Report
- Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Cached
Supreme Court of India Supreme General Films Exchange ... vs His Highness Maharaja Sir ... on 4 August, 1975 Equivalent citations ... Bench: Beg, M Hameedullah PETITIONER: SUPREME GENERAL FILMS EXCHANGE LTD. Vs. RESPONDENT: HIS HIGHNESS MAHARAJA SIR BRIJNATH SINGHJI
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 17 - Cited by 34 -
1975 AIR 1810
Commis- sion on "Constitutional Division within the Supreme Court-—-A proposal for." The subject was taken ... Supreme Court, page 318. 3. Mcwhiuney, “Federal Supreme Courts and Constitutional Rewi•:w” {1967) 45 Ca¤._Ba1·
Law Commission Report
- Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Cached
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next