1 - 10 of 2454 (1.35 seconds)
evidence of the conversation
was as much primary evidence as the evidence
from the replaying of the tape recorder. Each ... evidence at the trial by the evidence of the police
officer giving evidence after refreshing his memory from the
tape
Supreme Court of India
Supreme
Court considered the relevancy and admissibility of tape-recorded
evidence, holding in that case (p. 149):
...The tape record ... make suggestions relating to future
legislation about tape-recorded evidence.
11. Before leaving this point, however, we would like
Bombay High Court
other
charges-Conversation between appellant and witness tape
recorded-Whether admissible in evidence Indian Telegraph
Act-S. 25-Scope.
HEADNOTE ... witness and the appellant which was recorded on the tape.
The evidence was illegally obtained in contravention
Supreme Court of India
evidence - Safeguards to be taken in using tape
recorded evidence.
HEADNOTE:
In the general election to the State Assembly held ... tape recorded statement has to
be proved by the maker of the record by satisfactory
evidence.[414 F]
(4) Every
Supreme Court of India
tenancy-Tenant, if liable to be evicted
Evidence-Tape recorded evidence only corroborative in
nature.
HEADNOTE:
Section ... upon. [623 E-
F]
(b) That apart, the tape-recorded evidence indicated
that on the expiry of the term
Supreme Court of India
tape recorded statement@@
i
has to be proved by the maker of the record by
satisfactory evidence direct or circumstantial ... tape records are admissible, provided the accuracy
of the recordings can be proved and the voices recorded
properly identified
Kerala High Court
Bombay High Court
@ Neharulla Karamtulla Rais vs The State Of Maharashtra on 7 May, 2013
Bombay High Court
admissibility of
evidence, recording of evidence and appreciation of
evidence. It is settled law that tape recorded
conversation is admissible ... importance is how the tape recorded conversation is to
be recorded as evidence and appreciated thereafter.
Recording
Bombay High Court
said tape-
recorded evidence. Where the voice is denied by the alleged maker thereof, a
comparison of the same becomes ... said that the admissibility of the tape recorded
evidence offended Arts. 20(3) and 21 of the Constitution. The
submission
Delhi High Court
Bombay High Court
@ Neharulla Karamtulla Rais vs The State Of Maharashtra on 7 May, 2013
Bombay High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -