1 - 10 of 3655 (0.32 seconds)
made by a complainant that--
(i) 2[ an unfair trade practice or a restrictive trade practice has been adopted ... package form, includes the packer thereof;
(r) 1[ " unfair trade practice" means a trade practice which, for the purpose
Central Government Act
regulating self- regulatory organisations;
(e) prohibiting fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities markets;
(f) promoting investors' education
Central Government Act
servi- ces in question;
(f) to discontinue the unfair trade practice or the restric- tive trade practice
Central Government Act
carry on, any monopolistic or any
restrictive, or unfair, trade practice and such monopolistic
or restrictive, or unfair trade practice ... from carrying on any monopolistic
or restrictive, or unfair, trade practice until the
conclusion of such inquiry or until further
Supreme Court of India
that the appellants have indulged in
restrictive and unfair trade practices within the meaning of
Section ... applications for allotment which is a
deceptive and unfair trade practice within the
meaning of Section 36A of the MRTP
Supreme Court of India
Commission to held an inquiry into the unfair trade
practices under Section 36 D(I) of the Act and pass ... trade practices. The commission erroneously
assumed that there was per practices. The Commission
erroneously assumed that there was unfair trade
Supreme Court of India
Section 36A(1)(i) and (v)--Unfair Trade practice--Test to be
applied-Examine whether representation contains a false
statement ... whether the said Company was indulging in
certain unfair trade practices prejudicial to the public
interest within the meaning
Supreme Court of India
held that the appellants were guilty of an
unfair trade practice within the meaning of The Monopolies
and Restrictive Trade ... that
which had been held to be an unfair trade practice.
The appellants manufacture and market consumer
products, including Hornlike
Supreme Court of India
unfair trade practices
covered by Section 36-A(1)(i) and (vi) of the MRTP Act.
Admittedly, the Central Government ... mentioned that action of the
Board amounted to unfair trade practice under Section
36-A(1) of the Act; even
Supreme Court of India
filed two
applications before the Commission viz. Unfair Trade Practices
Enquiry (UTPE) No. 388 of 1997 in effect complaining ... unfair
trade practices by the appellant and the respondent No.2
relating to the supply of the printing machine. Compensation
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -